The art of knowing criticize in this era

The art of knowing criticize in this era https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-d6PYU22iYRToSm_uhmb1N3nF7t01Y6eG4pYkxu-J2qCK5cIPdihg5KVrGc_C4eqJoRgwTnodoBdYkXKREXf0WiIIU3gOEeHBgaXXvTztlNhifvPRKRfw8N2j0lS920xyHNitvCnpztI/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/opinoologos.jpg

The art of knowing criticize in this era









We are at a moment in history when everything is defined by the internet and social networks, but as things turn out, soon being smart and questioning things in order to get to know reality will be considered as class and privilege of elites .

We are facing the world dominated by the millennials, the ninis and now the newcomers "centennials" or weak generation, who are prepared to receive everything free, premasticated, and even predigested, but without having fought or worked for anything. They do not have the courage to face the harsh reality in front of them, much less are they willing to leave their comfort zone, and even seek to expand their "safe area", so as not to feel intimidated.

But if someone questions or questions their ideas, they throw themselves in a pack to censor it or try to discredit it. The outstanding computer analyst Leo Garcia has mentioned in this regard "What a curious phenomenon is trolling, disguised as activism. And as always, there is a word for that, it is called slacktivism. The current quintessence of social networks: the lynching of discordant ideas ".

Something very similar has been put forward by the great Chilean scientific disseminator Gabriel León: "In the end, we have built a society in which even the most inept members can survive without major problems. I do not know how to feel about it. "

We have noticed something very regrettable, but they had already warned us at the time. Democracy does not work when the vast majority of the population is uneducated and ignorant. And their main weapon is the assault and insult, but like sabemios, the insult is the emergency exit for the imbecile before the lack of arguments.

We have to remember that journalism is not just a trade, it is a way of life. Journalists really are to criticize and point to the government and society itself. They are the ones who point out the straight path to follow. Whoever censures them only denotes their inner rot.

Criticism is to correct and build, in a few words it is to polish. All criticism is constructive, but obviously, to criticize first you must have built something successful. If the work is destroyed with criticism, it is that the work itself was bad and unsustainable. It's like the thing about flies being killed at periodic intervals.

Criticism, although they do not believe it, in a metaphorical way, one could say that it is the chisel that stings the rough rock, from which a masterpiece of sculpture can emerge. The blows of the chisel are hard, but without them the final work would not come to an end.

Criticism is an art, because it is perfectible and can help to enhance the human being through it, both the one who does it, if it is honest and honest, and the one who receives it if it has enough character and reason to assimilate it.

Do not worry about receiving a lot of criticism, worry if you do not listen to them.

http://twitter.com/belduque
http://facebook.com/BelduqueOriginal






SOURCE LINK THE BEST ONLINE UFO WEBSITES https://www.beviral.online

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Grupos de privacidad que reclaman anuncios en línea pueden dirigirse a víctimas de abuso

¿Puede Apple Watch prevenir los golpes? Nuevo estudio pretende descubrir

Las empresas ofrecen regalos gratuitos, ofertas especiales de cierre y asistencia a los trabajadores...