UFOs seen on the Irish coast by airline pilots - Here are the details
UFOs seen on the Irish coast by airline pilots - Here are the details
- The facts:
A study that claims that Earth's oceans have retained 60% more heat than was thought in the last 25 years, suggesting that global warming was much worse than previously believed, has turned out to be false .
- Reflect on:
Many scientists in the field have been quite frank about the politicization of climate science and how it is a serious problem. We see it in all fields, such as the medical field, for example. Ridicule has been used to suppress the discussion.
There is a worrisome trend among Internet readers, and that is the fact that billions of people are reading titles of an article and having a bad reaction before reading the actual article and examining the sources. Bad reaction usually occurs when evidence is presented that goes against the widely accepted belief of most people. This type of evidence is often ridiculed by the mainstream media, which is why most people believe what they do in the first place.
We have been subjected to massive amounts of "mental persuasion" on several issues. Today, when the evidence goes against the grain, especially when it threatens many political and financial interests, false evidence is fabricated to counteract the real evidence. This has happened in all the areas that touch humanity. I refer to this as the politicization of science, in this case, climate science. We have seen it everywhere, especially with medical science.
"The case against science is simple: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be false. . . . Science has turned towards darkness. "- Dr. Richard Horton, Editor in Chief of The Lancet (source)
Now, to be clear, this article is NOT discussing climate change. Drastic and unexpected climate change and natural disasters are rampant at this time on our planet, for multiple reasons. Clearly, it is a problem that must be solved and could have been solved / mitigated decades ago, however, we still seem stagnant. Revolutionary technologies they have existed for a long time, from solar energy to wind, to vortex-induced vibrations and superunit energy technology. Many of them have been subjected to Suppression of patents and secrecy, for purposes of "natural security". Meanwhile, this is national security apparatus that have created a dissident civilization, one that has become highly technologically advanced. They use these technologies, not for the benefit of humanity, but it seems more so, for their own purposes and the enslavement of humanity.
All that is said, climate change is, in my opinion, the result of multiple factors that go beyond human beings. These include natural cycles through which the Earth has passed before in its past, the activity of our sun, etc.
Once again, I am not denying climate change, I am not even denying anthropomorphic climate change. I am simply pointing to the politicization of science. Something strange is happening.
In fact, approximately More than thirty thousand scientists. They have all signed a petition regarding the political agenda of global warming. The scientific consensus, which includes more than 9,000 scientists with Ph.D.s, is the true scientific consensus. There is no real source for the "97" percent of scientists to agree, that is false information.
Warmer oceans?
Princeton scientist Laure Resplandy (pictured above) and researchers at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography Recently published a study. Affirming that Earth's oceans have retained 60% more heat than was thought in the last 25 years, suggesting that global warming was much worse than previously believed. The report was issued by multiple spokesmen for the establishment, including the Washington Post, the New York Times, the BBC, Reuters and others.
Independent scientist Nic Lewis discovered that the study had "seemingly serious (but surely unnoticed) errors in the underlying calculations." Lewis's findings were quickly corroborated by another researcher. The post appeared on the website by Judith A. Curry, an American climatologist and former president of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She has been one of the many scientists open in the field of "tribal nature" of parts of the climate science community, and what she sees as an obstacle in publishing data and analyzing it for an independent review .
Lewis corrected the area of mathematics and found that the rate of ocean warming in the document "is approximately average compared to other estimates that showed, and below the average of 1993-2016." Roger Pike Jr., a professor at the University of Colorado, tweeted his work and replicated the data. Key phrase: "It's a big mistake at the core of the document's findings."
It seems that most climate scientists support this type of fraudulent data, and the problem of political interests that take charge of what science really says.
Lewis found that the authors of the study, led by Princeton University scientist Laure Resplandy, were wrong to calculate the linear trend of oceanic warming estimated between 1991 and 2016. Lewis also Criticized the predictions of the climate model., which generally overestimates the heating. Resplandy and his colleagues estimated the heat of the ocean by measuring the volume of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the atmosphere. The results: the oceans consumed 60 percent more heat than previously thought. The study only rang the alarms, especially as a result of the The last climate of the United Nations
Laure Resplandy, the author of the widely distributed and cited study, has recently responded, recognizing the error. Although the answer comes from an establishment spokesperson, one that ridicules any questioning of anthropomorphic climate change through carbon production.
Below is a brief interview with Curry.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zk7Xfyv6k4?start=0&modestbranding=1&showinfo=0&theme=light]
The politicization of climate science.
Again, we must observe deforestation, the lack of disclosure of new energy technologies and the lack of implementation of new technologies. We need to observe the destruction of our Earth and the poisoning of our water and soil, rather than the production of carbon. But carbon is very concentrated.
The politicization of climate science is something that is supported by most real climate scientists.
It's hard to talk about that because I am a supporter of clean energy technologies, and they are a necessity. Our industries and our use of pollution services, such as the automobile industry, is a danger to environmental and toxic health. But the global elite is very smart, is using climate change and global warming, basically to cause climatic hysteria for political and financial purposes.
The slogan "97 percent" is often used to demonize those who question anthropogenic-induced climate change, and traditional media will do everything possible for those who question it, regardless of origin, credentials or credibility, to appear foolish. .
Ivar Giaever, a Norwegian-American physicist who shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973, compares current climate science with pseudoscience.
Dr. Richard Lindzen, among many others, refers to this type of narrative as hysteria and argues that the climate scientists who pose this problem have been demonized. He is one of the best experts in the field in the world and the main author of "Processes and comments on physical climate", Chapter 7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Third evaluation report on climate change.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwqIy8Ikv-c?start=0&modestbranding=1&showinfo=0&theme=light]
He is a dynamic meteorologist with interests in the general topics of climate, planetary waves, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres and hydrodynamic instability. He has made important contributions to the development of the current theory for the circulation of Hadley and has been a pioneer in the study of how photochemistry of ozone, radiative transfer and dynamics interact with each other. He is also Professor Emeritus of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
A slide from one of your conferences below states:
Global warming has to do with politics and power rather than with science. In science, there is an attempt to clarify; In global warming, language is misused to confuse and deceive the public. The misuse of language extends to the misuse of models. For advocates of policies that purportedly address global warming, the role of models is not to predict, but to justify the claim that catastrophe is possible. As you understand it, proving that something is impossible is in itself almost impossible.
I am using it as one of the many examples. He noted how policy makers were very involved with the IPCC and its publications. He is one of the many who do it. Here is a video in which he tried to raise awareness about what climate scientists really believe. It is quite contrary to the climatic hysteria that we see that is constantly transmitted. At this moment it is happening with forest fires, which have been happening for hundreds of millions of years.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2czGg3fUUA?start=641&feature=oembed&w=740&h=416]
Why not mention climate engineering?
What happens with climate engineering? Geoengineering is the manipulation of the atmosphere through artificial means.
The US Air Force UU It has the ability to manipulate the climate, either for testing purposes or for full military intelligence use. These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes.
Climate modification will become part of national and international security and could be done unilaterally ... It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate rainfall, fog and storms in the earth or to modify the space weather ... and the production of artificial climate are part of an integrated set of technologies. which can provide a substantial increase in the US UU., Or a degraded capacity in an adversary, to achieve a global consciousness, scope and power. (Air University of the US Air Force, Final Report of AF 2025, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ . Emphasis added)
We have covered this topic in depth in several articles, and at this time, geoengineering is proposed as a solution to climate change, or what scientists previously referred to as "climatic hysteria". Manipulated for various reasons. It is difficult to say what is really happening. Here is a clip from the director of Ex-Cia expressing his support for geoengineering ...
Climate hysteria can be created, as much as terrorism can to create the war against terrorism ...
The Takeaway
Literally, I could write a book about how most of the renowned scientists in the field of Climate Science, and those who are really involved with the IPCC, are concerned about these things. As many of these scientists have pointed out, at some point, drafts and final publications are taken and written by politicians and policy makers.
There is a big problem here, and the elite that seems to be behind this kind of thing, has been using their tools for years (media, education, etc.) to deepen this idea in the minds of the people. Climate initiatives are being supported as the war was with mass propaganda, our hearts and our care for Mother Earth are being exploited and capitalized. Those who question the official narrative of global climate change are often the ones who care most about Earth. This is one of the reasons why it is so important that the waking community strive for the truth, and then expose that truth widely. The future of our planet is at stake.
We need your support ...
The demand for Collective Evolution content is greater than ever, except that advertising agencies and social networks continue to cut our revenues. This is making it difficult for us to continue.
To keep us truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to place paywalls on this website, since we want our information to go everywhere. For just $ 3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario