The Battle of Los Angeles - A case study
The Battle of Los Angeles - A case study
Published for the first time: November 4, 2018
Estimated reading time: 22 minutes
The events in the first hours of the 25th.th February 1942 has been sensationalized several times in Hollywood movies, and perhaps because of this there may be a tendency to forget that the incident was very real, cost several lives, offering one of the most famous images in the history of UFOs , and perhaps most importantly, still remains unexplained. At least to a satisfactory degree. Taking place only months after the brutal attacks in Pearl Harbor - an incident that would drag the United States to the war being waged in Europe - the entire United States was already on high alert. And this was particularly true in the cities along the western Pacific coast of the United States.
Colored printing
Regardless of what was moving along the coastal region of Southern California, a trip that would see the strange object pass through several districts of Los Angeles, the US military was nervous enough to open fire. And the firing and artillery will continue for several hours. Certainly not the behavior of trained soldiers, and perhaps more to the point, of experienced commanders who authorized a preemptive strike for something that skeptics of the incident would say was simply a weather balloon, or even "the planet Venus." "The Battle of Los Angeles," sometimes called "The Great Air Raid of Los Angeles," is one of the most intriguing and possibly important nights of the twentieth century, of that, there is little doubt.
Before seeing that infamous night in the City of Angels, we will briefly examine the events of the previous twenty-four hours. It helps to understand the mentality of the people of California at that time. When an attack could arrive, as happened in Hawaii in December 1941, without warning and at any time. By the way, keep in mind that all times indicated correspond to the US Pacific time. UU
The day before! The bombing of Ellwood
In the 23rdrd In February 1942, the Ellwood naval base was suddenly attacked by Japanese forces. The Japanese had maintained a discreet presence in the area since the Pearl Harbor attacks of 7th December 1941. They even managed to sink two American ships and damaged six more. Just after 7 pm on the 23rdrd In February, there was a sudden bombardment when Japanese forces attacked off the coast. They would point to the Richfield aviation fuel tanks.
The attack would last about twenty minutes before the Japanese forces turned and left the area. Although the damage was very limited and there were no serious victims, the attack was a resounding success. He managed to capitalize on the fear already established in Pearl Harbor. That the American public could be attacked at any time and from anywhere along the west coast.
What may be of interest here is after the attacks at Ellwood, naval intelligence would announce to all relevant chains of command that another attack was imminent. In fact, it could be expected within the next ten hours. Later that night, numerous reports of "flares and flickering lights" would emerge from places around several defense plants along the California coast. At 7:18 pm, a full alert was issued. However, at 10:23 pm, it seemed that any perceived threat was a false alarm and the level of threat had decreased. The pardon would not last long.
Sirens and shots!
Just after 3 am, Los Angeles residents were cruelly dragged from their sleep by sirens announcing an attack. When the automatic shots were announced in sporadic but regular bursts, the citizens did not take long to remember images of the attacks of the previous day, or of Pearl Harbor, little more than two months before. In fact, many families, at least those who had them, would be taken immediately to their different anti-aircraft shelters, from professional buildings to very improvised facilities. Whatever happened outside was not a good thing, that was true.
Without the knowledge of the confused and increasingly frightened residents of the City of Angels, it was learned that the radar of the US Navy had detected an unidentified object about 120 miles west of the city and had been tracking it. Shortly after midnight. At 2:15 am, the anti-aircraft stations were put on hold. Several minutes later, with the object still approaching, they would receive a "Green Alert" that would indicate that they were ready to shoot immediately.
Those who did not have shelters to go to, or simply were not worried enough to use, would go to the previously serene and sleepy streets of several urbanizations in Los Angeles. It is from many of these "stragglers" on the street that some of the most accurate, and perhaps most important, witness statements will appear.
The following video below is an original piece of news footage about the incident.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m7736RMBEg?feature=oembed&w=900&h=675]
Something in the sky
The first thing the people who came out of their houses noticed was that, despite the automatic fire shooting towards the sky from the ground, there were no enemy combatants to fall to the ground in flames. In fact, there did not seem to be any plane in the sky. Nothing that descends and descends. Nothing sending short rattles of fire down. What many saw, however, was the vague shape of a huge oval object. An object that seemed to be the target of automatic military shooting. Except, nothing seemed to impact on it. Instead, it looked as if some kind of invisible shield was around this equally mysterious object.
As the residents of the many Los Angeles districts watched, it seemed as if a giant-like object moved quietly and gently through the dark early morning sky, seemingly oblivious to the round after a round of artillery fire from Heavy service. It was also many of these "street witnesses" who repeatedly reported the sound of American warplanes in the sky. However, the US Air Force UU And, in turn, the US Army. US, would deny any deployment of US aircraft on the night in question.
It would seem that the first sightings of the public would come from the Santa Monica area of the city shortly after 3 am. However, according to military reports, several sightings of "enemy aircraft" had come from defense posts along the coast for at least thirty minutes before that time. At 2:43 am, for example, several "planes" were spotted in Long Beach. Only moments later, another sighting claimed "25 planes at 12,000 feet" over downtown Los Angeles. At 3:06 am, there was a balloon with a red flash over Santa Monica. Seconds later the shots came.
Total blackout, confusing reports and deaths
Along with the ominous warning of the sirens, came the order of a complete blackout. Not a single light from a single house or vehicle was lit in Los Angeles shortly after 3 am.
During the three and a half hours until just after 7 in the morning, when a moment of normality arrived in the morning light, numerous and varied reports would circulate. Both among the military and throughout the community. Many "aircraft" reports, for example, would appear, although most would insist that the aircraft in question were US aircraft.
There were, however, several deaths that would share, at least, an indirect connection with the events of the first hours of the night.th February 1942. All the dead were civilians. Some were victims of traffic accidents, as they had made fatal attempts to negotiate the blackened roads. It is believed that at least one person died as a result of the fall of the shrapnel. Many other deaths, attributed to heart attacks, are also widely accepted as a consequence of strange and frightening events.
The account of Katie"
While we will see some of the other witness statements of the incident, one of the particular intrigues is that of "Katie", Who at that time was an interior designer and artist who worked with many of the Hollywood stars. It was also, along with more than 12,000 residents of Los Angeles, a volunteer forward. Then, when his phone rang in the early hours of 25th In February, she already had an idea that something was about to happen. She was not wrong. At the other end of the line was his district air strike supervisor. There was, they said, an immediate alert. More intriguing, they wanted to know if she had seen anything unusual in heaven. More specifically near your home.
Katie lived near Santa Monica on the west side of Los Angeles. When the question was asked, he went to the window of the room where he was. Later he would remind the UFO researcher, Jeff Rense: "It was huge." It was simply huge. And it was practically right over my house. I had never seen anything like it in my life. "She would continue that she was" just floating there. "I would remember that whatever the object was, it was a" lovely pale orange "and although it had a" strange "quality, it was" the most beautiful thing. "I had never seen.
Partly because there was no other light competing due to the blackout, the object would shine spectacularly in the dark black sky. It was around this time when the US military projectors. UU They found the object with the glow.
Original image of the LA Times.
"It was like the fourth of July!"
Like many of the other witnesses, Katie would declare with absolute certainty, "they sent fighter planes, and I saw them in groups approaching and then turning around." She would also remember how the planes were "firing at him, but it did not seem to matter." Katie, the planes would make several approaches but they would retreat suddenly, then the ground artillery started firing, so much firepower was sent up that it was "like the Fourth of July" with the army "firing like crazy".
Katie would continue to watch events unfold from the relative safety of her living room window for almost half an hour. Then, the object began to move away, eventually disappearing into the night. Also like many other witnesses, Katie would remember that several "direct hits" hit the surface of the object. However, no damage was visible. In fact, it would seem that the huge shells simply fell to the ground at the last moment. Despite the apparent attack of this mysterious object, Katie would remember that it was a "magnificent sight". Simply wonderful ".
The retired anthropology professor, Scott Littleton, who at the time was just a boy, and whose father was also an air watchman. He also had an almost perfect vision of the incident.. He would describe the object as "like a pill" with artillery shells exploding "around him". Also, like Katie, she would claim the very real presence of the American warplanes.
In fact, Littleton would prove to be a strong voice during the decades that followed with respect to the encounter. In fact, he may be one of the key witnesses of that winter night in February 1942.
"The threat of invasion was still palpable!"
Although Littleton was only a small boy at the time of the incident, that stranger night is etched in his mind. Littleton became a university professor of anthropology from 1962 until his retirement forty years later, in 2002. His studies and teachings took him through a wide range of mythology and folklore. He was also interested in the question of UFOs and extraterrestrial life. In particular, what could be the "possible implications for mythology and folklore".
Littleton would describe the battle of Los Angeles as "the night a UFO was fired by the United States repeatedly without any apparent effectLittleton would witness the events near his home in Playa Hermosa, and with the Pearl Harbor events still fresh in everyone's mind, California residents were well aware of their location on the coast. The invasion was still palpable, if not imminent, "in the minds of many." In fact, even military sources and intelligence would suggest that such a bombing campaign, probably by the Japanese, was inevitable.
Along the coast, from Santa Monica Bay, to Malibu, to Palos Verdes, anti-aircraft guns fired their deadly charges at targets that were deliberately dragged across the skies above the water. US aircraft UU Specially designed would drag along these targets, allowing those who might one day be firing at enemy planes that approach practice. These screens would often entertain the locals, including the young Littleton, who would remember them as "a great spectacle", during which the projectors from the ground would ignite not only the "targets" but also the explosive projectiles. These practice runs would normally take place from 9 pm to 10 pm each night.
"The system totally collapsed!"
There were also regular blackouts, of which Littleton's father, as a volunteer air watchman, would receive prior notice. During those blackouts, you would have to put on your helmet and patrol the streets in your designated area, making sure that all the curtains would be closed and / or the lights off, and make sure that anyone who should not be outside returned home immediately. In general, these practice races were always relatively easy. However, in the first hours of 25th In February, during "the real thing", Littleton would remember that "the system collapsed completely".
The practice had followed its normal course on the night of the 24th.th February before shut up just after 10 o'clock at night. Littleton clearly remembers going to bed shortly after the usual screen, reading for a while before falling asleep. The next thing he knew, it was at 3:15 am, and it sounded like thunder outside. After shaking the dream from his mind, he realized that the "thunder" was, in fact, anti-aircraft fire. Thinking that it was possibly another exercise, he soon dismissed notions like "there was something about the speed and intensity of the bombing that just did not seem right".
As he looked out the window of his room, he could instantly make out the bulbs that swept the night sky. Among them were the "brilliant flashes of explosive rounds". This further distanced the idea of what I was seeing was an exercise of some kind. Explosions during practice races used to be a good way out to sea. These explosions were much closer to the continent. Then, he could hear his parents talking in the hallway of the house. When he stuck his head out the door, he could clearly see the expression of concern on his father's face.
"I think this could be the real thing!"
According to Littleton, his father could not understand why he, or other local airguards did not receive news. Whether it is a simulation or a "real attack", all local airguards must be notified to attend their positions. This could be an interesting point. Littleton's father would make several phone calls to the Civil Defense headquarters in an attempt to obtain information. Nobody, however, would pick up. He would make the decision to take the streets according to his duties of his own free will in the absence of a superior command. Apparently, later, it would turn out that, although the alarm was activated between 2:00 and 3:00 and 2:25 in the morning, someone forgot to notify the local airguards.
However, as we will recall, Katie was notified shortly after 3 am. In fact, he would receive questions about whether he could visually see something from his position. Again, this is mere speculation, could it have been an intentional decision to keep so many air strike guards inside? Could they have wished for as few witnesses as possible?
Regardless of the reason, after Littleton's father was away for a short time, he returned even more worried than before. By this time, the grandparents who stayed there were also awake and down. Littleton's father told them to go to the bomb shelter immediately. "I think this can be real," he said as he led them to the basement.
All those who could "Get out of it!"
While Littleton's family went into the basement, Littleton's father returned to the street. When his mother decided to go up and see what was happening about ten minutes later, Littleton discreetly accompanied him. The two went to the threshold of the house and then stayed there observing the fascinating events that took place over them.
Each one of them looked at the silver "rhombus-shaped bug" that shone brightly in the reflectors that had converged on it. For several moments, the object simply stood motionless in the air, seemingly happy to take the apparent blows from the constant discharge of gunfire and heavy artillery from below. Then, it began to move slowly. He would head for Redondo Beach, southeast of his address. They watched him for several minutes before he disappeared from sight.
Although it disappeared from the sight of Littleton, when the object passed by the beach of Redondo, a five-year-old boy, Tike Karavas, witness him pass over his family home. Not only that, it seemed to descend slightly when doing so. The rest of the Karavas family also witnessed the incident, and even Tike's father tried to follow the ship in his car in case he landed. However, instead of landing, the object would begin to rise again. Go south of the beach, along the coast where the LAX airport is located today, before going through the El Segundo oil refinery. Karavas would remember that, despite the weather, "almost everyone in our block who could, got up to go out and see it." Despite the intense bombardment of anti-aircraft fire, the mysterious object "escaped unharmed".
the "Balloon"Explanation
Littleton, who for obvious reasons would have an intense interest in the case and has conducted his own investigations into it, will take the particular exception that the entire episode, including the firing of the United States Army, was no more than a balloon that I deviate from the course. In fact, he would say that his official explanation is almost impossible.
Remember, most of the sightings and most of the shooting took place in the Santa Monica area of Los Angeles. Littleton's research shows that the only place in Los Angeles where such balloons were found was south of Santa Monica, in El Segundo. Littleton would explain that this would mean that, assuming there was a balloon of this type (there were no reports of any lost or stolen balloons on or around the night in question), he would have to find his way almost perfectly north towards Santa Monica. Once at his destination, he would float in the same place, somehow absorbing the firepower of the antiaircraft guns that were below for about thirty minutes, before moving quietly away in a different direction from the way he arrived.
Perhaps supporting the claims of Littleton's and many other UFO researchers that the object hovering over Los Angeles was far from being a globe and, in fact, a ship of nuts and bolts from another part of the galaxy comes from a of the most famous and iconic. Images of the incident.
Before moving on to that, however, check out the following video below. Introduce Scott Littleton talking about the incident.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY1saJ80vL4?feature=oembed&w=900&h=675]
The photograph
As the events unfolded, a reporter for the Los Angeles Times newspaper would receive the news that "something" was happening near Santa Monica. The reporter in question lived about twelve miles away, east of the area in the city of San Gabriel Valley. Immediately he dressed and jumped into his car, stepping cautiously along the now blackened roads, unable to use his headlights in case he attracted the attention of the police, the army or the air strike guards who ordered him to enter or I will arrest
He arrived near his destination shortly thereafter, settling near the Baldwin Hills. The reporter could clearly see the object trapped in the collective glow of the various projectors in it. He jumped out of his car, the guns sounded louder as he did so, and pointed his camera at the scene above him. He closed the photo, and on the 26thth February, the image would be published in the newspaper "Los Angeles Times". Millions of people around the world would study the image for years.
Does it show an extraterrestrial ship that bears an intense barrage of military firepower from the United States? Although there have been accusations of "retouching" photography, in fact it is a genuine image. These "retouches" are, in fact, simply changes of contrast and thus to provide the image with greater clarity for the printing of the newspaper. As you can see in the image below. It certainly seems as if the reflective brightness of a disk-shaped ship is clearly visible.
Take a look at the image below.
The objects outside the sea incident, 9th December 1941
Although they are not as popular, and there may not be a connection, two sightings on the respective afternoons of 9th and 11th Certainly it is worth looking at December 1941. Perhaps not less important due to the military presence in each one of them.
The first took place north of Los Angeles in San Francisco (a relative stone throw) on the afternoon of 9th December. According to the main witness, General Ryan, several strange objects "came out of the sea"Causing the US Navy to send three ships to investigate what the strange vessels were, he told the newspaper" The Times Union "that" I do not know how many airplanes there were, but there were a large number. "Since Ryan claims that these "Planes" came out of the sea, it is likely that we can replace the word airplane with UFO, remember a phrase that is still a decade away from its possible interweaving in the fabric of American popular culture.
Ryan would elaborate more in response to a question if the "planes" were Japanese by simply saying, "They were not Army aircraft, they were not Navy planes, and you can be sure they were not civilian aircraft." He would stop before pointing the finger at the Japanese, but he was emphatic that the incident "was not a test". The whole city was under power failure. However, residents along the water front would claim to have witnessed around 60 US Army trucks. UU They put anti-aircraft guns on the water's edge. One official explanation was that the operation was simply a test in response to the declaration of war in Japan by the United States and Great Britain only twenty-four hours earlier.
The Los Angeles Blackout Incident, 11th December 1941
Two nights later, in Los Angeles (although areas as far away as San Diego and even Las Vegas were affected), Another blackout took over the city.. Once again, just like General Ryan had forty-eight hours earlier, the Interceptor Command announcement would state that "this is not a blackout practice."
It was a little after 7:35 pm when the warning signal turned yellow. This indicated that an "unidentified aircraft" was approaching the city. And what's more, they were approaching from the stretches of the Pacific Ocean. All air and naval bases would be put on instant alert, with antiaircraft posts waiting along the water front. Some witnesses would later testify that they could hear anti-aircraft fire, although the military would declare that there was no authorization to shoot. That a "situation" was underway, however, was true. The Interceptor Command would indicate: "There are planes over southern Los Angeles that are not identified. The area will be darkened until we can identify them. "
Soon after, several response aircraft would leave the runway of their respective airports to investigate these strange objects that are approaching. While there was no known interception, the blackout mission was an apparent "success".
It may be interesting that the descriptions of these trades seem to fit those presumably witnessed in several places in the United States (and even Mexico) in the early 1940s, some of which we will see a little later, and that They can also share a connection with the apparent events of Los Angeles in February 1942.
However, if these incidents were simply military tests, could it be that the supposed Battle of Los Angeles was also a similar test?
A soldier "False flagEvent?
There are many reasons to suppose that the events were false, possibly to maintain support for the participation of the United States in World War II. As we have seen earlier in our look at the Pearl Harbor events, there are substantial reasons to believe that the key event that brought the United States to World War II was allowed, at best, to happen, at worst of the cases, of an intentional planning. Could the "Battle of Los Angeles" have been a similar event? There is certainly an argument for the claim.
For example, Several radar operators would declare in a television documentary in the early 2000s. They received a warning from their superiors to wait for a "next objective". One would even go so far as to say that "... it was a meteorologist balloon, with a cable wavelength attached (a) for the radar to detect." Does this suggest that there was an intentional operation? Or is it simply a case of an erroneous sighting by the radar operators in question? Or is this possibly a case of misinformation? How, for example, would the "balloon explanation" coincide with the "Katie" sighting? Or, could Katie's claims be misinformation to get away from secret military actions? After all, she was a volunteer ranger. Maybe she would see it as her duty?
If we assume that this was a military test, the fact that several residents would lose their lives would mean that the military would have to maintain that "something" took place. So they do not face scrutiny and possibly legal demands for possible "reckless" behavior and a disregard for the safety of their own citizens? Or could it be a military test of otherworldly technology?
Connections to the little-known accident in Missouri?
Perhaps, however, the incident was handled the way it was done by the military because of an apparent UFO downed near Cape Girardeau in Missouri only a few months earlier, in April 1941. According to the report's witness, Charlotte Mann, recalled how her grandfather, the Reverend William Huffman, received a call from the nearby military base. According to Mann, a large "strange disk" made of some unknown metallic material had crashed to the ground in the open field. The army was already on the scene. They required Huffman's services to "administer the last rites."
Seeing this trade out of this world, Huffman would realize that these last rites were not human at all. I would see three small bodies lying together near the crippled ship. The three were already dead, but Huffman said a prayer for each one anyway. When he returned home later in the morning, he would tell his wife and Charlotte that the remains "were definitely not human." By the way, several interesting details would appear in the report. The first, the use of a strange metal material similar to a metal sheet present in the scene (which would occur more prominently during the Roswell accident six years later). And the apparent "hieroglyphics of ancient Egyptian style" on the outside, another seemingly strange detail that appears in other UFO encounters.
Perhaps this last detail is also interesting, another little-known report. One of a "plane crash" on the morning of the 24thth February near the heart of Hollywood. A crash that might not have been a "flat" accident at all.
More UFO "It crashesIn America in the early forties we know?
A witness would testify that he saw "Japanese writing" on the wreckage of the ship. The remains that, curiously, were covered by the army within minutes of the apparent accident. Japanese aircraft marked their aircraft using Arabic numbers during World War II. He could not, then, have been a Japanese plane that saw the witness. Could it be that it was not Japanese writing, but Egyptian-style hieroglyphics? And it is possible that it was not an airplane, but an unknown ship? Could it be that the Battle of Los Angeles was the result of an extraterrestrial craft? One that could have started before the first hours of the night.th February?
Al igual que el incidente de Missouri mencionado anteriormente, hay otro encuentro que muy bien puede compartir una conexión con los eventos en la Ciudad de los Ángeles. A fines de octubre de 1941, un ovni aparentemente se estrelló contra el suelo en Sonora, México. El ejército de EE. UU Logró localizarlo y recuperarlo, y devolverlo a Estados Unidos. Al igual que la supuesta colisión en Misuri, así como la recuperación de la propia nave, había varios cuerpos extraños. ¿Podrían esta nave y, más específicamente, las entidades inteligentes detrás de ella ser las mismas que aparecieron en Los Ángeles?
Aunque ocurrió después del incidente de Los Ángeles, otro OVNI aparentemente se estrelló en la Tierra a fines de 1942 "en algún lugar al norte de Georgia". Al igual que las cuentas anteriores, el objeto era similar a un disco, plateado y metálico, y contenía varias entidades pequeñas. Varios meses después, en abril de 1943, el piloto estadounidense, Gerry Casey, notaría un objeto plateado en forma de disco. Se acercaría a su avión mientras navegaba por la costa de California cerca de la montaña de Santiago. Permaneció con ellos durante varios minutos antes de desaparecer a la velocidad.
Ingeniería inversa y análisis oportunista de reacciones.
O, por improbable que sea, ¿podrían ser genuinas las cuentas de los OVNI derribados en Misuri y Sonora? ¿Consiguió el ejército de los Estados Unidos aplicar ingeniería inversa a esta tecnología recuperada? ¿El avistamiento y el incidente que siguió han sido un vuelo de prueba del ejército de los Estados Unidos? Recuerde, algunos operadores de radar insisten en que recibirían instrucciones para "esperar un objetivo entrante". Esto, antes de que recogieran por primera vez el extraño objeto que se acercaba a la costa de California.
¿Es posible que este objetivo esperado fuera un disco reparado de un accidente ovni anterior (y genuino) que ahora está siendo probado por el personal militar de los Estados Unidos? Es, sin duda, una idea muy poco probable. No tanto como que esa nave alienígena no se estrelló en estos diferentes lugares de los Estados Unidos. Pero que nuestros científicos hubieran podido realizar ingeniería inversa en algo tan tecnológicamente avanzado tan rápido. Aunque la revolución tecnológica estaba a la vuelta de la esquina después del final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Quizás deberíamos dar más crédito a tales científicos.
Como una ocurrencia tardía, tal vez la reacción del público a un oficio tan sobrenatural sea la clave. ¿Quizás la situación ofrecería a los Estados Unidos una idea de cómo podrían usarla en su beneficio? Ciertamente es una posibilidad. Especially given everything we now know regarding UFO encounters from the late-1940s onwards. Might the public’s reaction offered the US military insight in how to handle any future such episodes? Or perhaps the incident was a secret military experiment. And the insight was in how the public instead would seek an otherworldly explanation. So leaving such military action unexposed, and unaccountable.
The video below goes over the incident.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oY8HIWBS-Y?feature=oembed&w=900&h=506]
A Much Darker Goal?
The way the military would act and the initial information they shared with the press is interesting. Perhaps a forerunner to how the eventual Roswell incident would unfold. For example, the initial press reports were relatively full of detail. The very few that followed weren’t. Then, reports seemed to die down altogether. Almost unnaturally so. They would claim there was no credibility in the witness statements. It is very likely that many people would contact the press with all manner of wild tales. Whether for a little attention and possibly monetary reward. It would appear an overreaction, to say the least, to simply drop the story altogether, however. In fact, it simply doesn’t make sense. Unless, of course, considering the fact that the United States was officially “at war”, they would receive instructions to do so.
Perhaps the military, and even, in turn, the US government were using the incident to their own ends. Maybe they manufactured it and it was indeed a “false flag”. Or maybe they were completely off-guard to an unknown enemy. It was very much in their interests, though, to have the public suspect the Japanese were behind the attack. And the general fear in the populace of another similar encounter did nothing to hurt their cause.
At the time of the incident, the heavily controversial (even then) Executive Order 9606 was racing it was through the significant legal channels. An order that would relocate Japanese-American citizens and Japanese immigrants alike. Essentially, it was an internment order which would send such people to nothing more than concentration camps. Many people saw the order as a form of “ethnic cleansing”. To some, having the public fear such Japanese attacks would perhaps calm this resistance somewhat.
California’s Long Supernatural History
Or maybe the answer is more supernatural? The event that is The Battle of Los Angeles certainly stands on its own as a unique event. However, the state of California is a hotbed of intriguing, fascinating, and chilling activity. And what’s more, it goes back hundreds, possibly thousands of years. With that in mind, might the alleged sighting of Los Angeles have been just one of those strange anomalous experiences? One that has plagued the area for eons and remains a mystery to all who study such events even today?
Or, might there be a connection to Mount Shasta? Itself an ancient body that has all manner of strange accounts to its name? Including that it hosts within its bowels an alien base that stretches underground for all miles around. And, that somewhere above its majestic peak, a portal exists where such cosmic craft come and go from the Earth. Interestingly enough, US Navy records show tracking of an unidentified craft moving into the Santa Monic mountain range. It had arrived from the north, coincidentally enough where Mount Shasta resides. Sightings of strange lights and orbs are common in and around the area of the ancient and enchanting mountain. Many Native American tribes have lived in the area for hundreds of years. They state that a network of caves and tunnels lead to the “inner Earth”.
Check out the short video below. It is from 2013 and claims to show a UFO leaving the planet via a portal contained within a vortex. If this footage is genuine, might it suggest that what eventually drew the gunfire of the US military in February 1942, had indeed originated from the same type of portal in the same location?
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-P7FwlZjG0?feature=oembed&w=900&h=506]
A Reaction Undertaken By A Miniscule Percent Of The Population!
Like many of the cases we examine, that “something” significant took place between 2 am and 7 am on the 25th February 1942 is without question. Was it a military exercise that broke down among confusion and panic? So resulting in the unfortunate deaths of several Los Angeles residents? Or might it be one of many coldly calculated events to bring forth such measures as Executive 9606? Not to mention to drum up and maintain support for the United States entry into another war in Europe? It is a rather blunt accusation but certainly not one without merit. And not one that requires too much of a stretch of the imagination.
Or was there indeed a UFO, a craft from another world, hovering over human civilization? While it fired their comparatively primitive weapons at them in a blind panic? The US military, although far from the slick machine-like operation it is today, was still one of the world’s best. Perhaps there was the realization that humanity was simply ill-prepared? And no match for such cosmic visitors? Maybe this is the reason for the plethora of cover stories, denials, and general disinformation. All of which has polluted the UFO subject for decades?
Might this event even be the first time in the contemporary era such cosmic visitors were visible? If that is the case, what might the consequences be of our collective, and aggressive reaction? A reaction undertaken by a miniscule percent of the planet’s population. And authorized by an even tinier percent of that. That thought alone, in whatever walk of modern life, should be sobering enough.
The video below is one of many available looking at the Battle of Los Angeles.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDnFXfjxVl4?feature=oembed&w=900&h=506]
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online






Comentarios
Publicar un comentario