The $ 4.3 billion propaganda machine in the influenza vaccine industry is in full swing
The $ 4.3 billion propaganda machine in the influenza vaccine industry is in full swing
The flu season is again upon us: the time of year when the constant message is "Have you already been vaccinated against the flu?" Considering man ...
The flu season is again upon us: the time of year when the constant message is "Have you already been vaccinated against the flu?"Taking into account the numerous studies that show that flu vaccines offer minimal protection against diseases, even when they are well adapted to circulating viral strains, the fact that vaccination continues to be promoted as their first line of defense against influenza Influenza suggests that this annual campaign has more to do with generating compliance to obtain benefits. that actually improve and protect public health.
Questionable data used to support annual flu vaccination campaigns
Statistics reveal that in most years, flu vaccines they are, at best, 50 to 60 percent effective in the prevention of type A or B influenza confirmed by laboratory that requires medical attention.1 In the decade between 2005 and 2015, the influenza vaccine was less than 50 effective percent in more than half the time.2The flu vaccine 2017/2018 was a perfect example of this trend. The overall effectiveness of the adjusted vaccine against influenza A and B virus infection was only 36 percent.3
According to a 2014 meta-analysis, 4 71 people should be vaccinated to avoid a single case of influenza, a proportion that speaks to the ineffectiveness of this annual routine. Evidence5 (confirmed three years later6) suggests that vaccination against influenza can double your risk of an influenza pandemic or a more severe influenza attack.
The research7 published in 2011 also warned that the vaccine against seasonal flu appears to weaken the immune system of children and increases the chances of getting sick because of flu viruses that are not included in the vaccine.
When blood samples from healthy, unvaccinated children and children who had received an annual flu vaccine were compared, the unvaccinated group had naturally accumulated more antibodies in a wider variety of influenza strains compared to the vaccinated group.8
Evidence also shows that you can get vaccinated, show few or no symptoms, and still eliminate and spread the flu to others.9,10 Flu vaccines are also associated with debilitating and potentially lifelong side effects, such as Guillain syndrome. -Barré and chronic disease. Shoulder injury related to the administration of the vaccine..
The 2018/2019 flu season returns the failed nasal spray vaccine
Flu vaccines By their nature, they are a delicate business because flu viruses are constantly evolving and public health officials have to guess at least six months before the flu season starts, which type A and B flu virus strains may become predominant for pharmaceutical companies to manufacture vaccines.
When the strains chosen do not coincide with the strains that actually cause most of the disease in a given flu season, the vaccine failure rate increases significantly. But it is also important to realize that most of the influenza-like respiratory illnesses that people experience during a given flu season are not type A or B.
When you have a sore throat, runny headache, fatigue, low fever, body aches and cough, most of the time is another type of respiratory viral or bacterial infection not related to influenza viruses.
In fact, the data13,14,15,16 show that other types of viruses are responsible for approximately 80 percent of all respiratory infections during any flu season. The flu vaccine does not protect or prevent any of these other types of flu respiratory infections causing symptoms similar to influenza (ILI).
The possibility of contracting the real type A or B influenza, caused by one of the three or four strains of influenza virus included in the vaccine, is much lower compared to getting sick with another type of viral or bacterial infection during the flu season.
Having said all this, there are several different types of influenza vaccines to choose from in a given year. This year, the vaccine against the attenuated nasal spray application (FluMist), which the CDC's Immunization Practices Advisory Committee did not recommend during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons due to its extreme inefficiency, is again recommended by the CDC. .17
For the 2018/2019 season, FluMist is approved for non-pregnant persons between the ages of 2 and 49 years. Exceptions18 include children who take aspirin or medications that contain salicylate, those with suppressed immune function, children 2 to 4 years old who have asthma, have taken an antiviral medication in the past 48 hours, and some others.
High-dose flu vaccine for the elderly - 'Costs outweigh the benefits' say Canadian experts
You also have the injectable inactivated. vaccines against influenza, including a high-dose version for people over 65 years, which contains four times the amount of antigen that the regular dose of the standard vaccine.
In Canada, experts in infectious diseases have come out against the vaccine, saying it is not effective enough to justify its high cost, which is about five times that of the regular flu vaccine.19
According to British Columbia health officer Bonnie Henry, the research suggests that 200 older adults would have to be vaccinated with Fluzone High-Dose to prevent a single case of influenza, and 4,000 would have to be vaccinated to prevent a hospitalization related to the flu.
Due to their low performance, British Columbia, Quebec, Alberta, New Brunswick and Newfoundland will not cover the cost of Fluzone High-Dose for seniors who would otherwise receive flu vaccines on a regular and free basis.
The Globe and Mail reports: 21
"The divergent policies are part of a continuing debate on the flu vaccine that, according to experts, has important implications for future influenza vaccination programs, and the amount of money it costs to deliver them ...
"Danuta Skowronski, a leader in the epidemiology of influenza and emerging respiratory pathogens at the BC Center for Disease Control, said the benefits do not justify the price.
"He also said that the new flu vaccine has only been studied for a few seasons and that there are unanswered questions that health policy officials should consider before getting caught up in an expensive multi-year agreement.
"For example, emerging research suggests that people who go back to repeat flu vaccines each year may experience reduced immunity in subsequent years, which could have implications for older people receiving a high dose of the vaccine against. the flu, "he said.
Statistics of the Government of the United States: The vaccine against influenza is the most dangerous vaccine in America
What you need to know about flu vaccines produced from kidney and insect cells in dogs
A relative newcomer to the vaccine line is the quadrivalent flu vaccine called Flucelvax, which was available during the 2017/2018 season. Approved for people older than 4 years, this vaccine is unique because it uses dog kidney cells (MDCK) for production.22
Traditionally, the candidate vaccine strain influenza viruses, that is, viruses selected for inclusion in the vaccine, have been produced using fertilized chicken eggs.
Flucelvax viruses are cultured in animal cells grown in their place.23 (Another relatively new technology uses insect cells (armyworm) to produce a quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine, Flublok, for people over 18 years of age.24,25)
As the effectiveness of conventional flu vaccines continues to leave much to be desired, the new Flucelvax vaccine was touted as a new and improved version that would protect more people once the flu season arrived. In fact, a study26 conducted by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that its benefit was quite modest.
Although flu vaccines in general were only effective at 24 percent in preventing flu-related hospitalizations in people aged 65 and older, the Flucelvax vaccine had a 26.5 percent effectiveness rate in that population, hardly a major improvement.
It has been known for some time that growing influenza vaccines in eggs can lead to problematic mutations that make them less effective against circulating influenza viruses. Such was the case during the flu season from 2016 to 2017, when H3N2 viruses prevailed.
Writing in PNAS, 27 researchers noted: "Strains of human vaccines grown in eggs often have adaptive mutations that increase viral binding to chicken cells." They identified a mutation in the strain of the flu vaccine that produced antibodies that did not work well to neutralize the H3N2 viruses circulating that year.
But the hope that cell-based vaccines can solve this problem seems too optimistic. Dr. John Treanor, an expert in flu vaccines at the University of Rochester Medical Center, told STAT News in 2017.28 "There was no convincing evidence that [cell culture flu vaccine] It was better, so why would someone spend extra money to buy that? "
This was before the FDA data appeared in the 2017 to 2018 season, which offered evidence that the effectiveness was virtually identical to the conventional egg-based version.
Lack of quality in the science of vaccines and transparency
In his 2013 article, 29 "Influenza: Marketing Vaccine by Marketing Disease", BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, Ph.D., points out the lack of quality science that underpins the annual call for flu vaccination and the lack of government transparency. that in its commercialization of vaccines against influenza, the CDC does not fulfill its promise to "base all public health decisions on scientific data of the highest quality, derived in an open and objective manner".
The reaction of the vaccine summarizes Doshi's comments, in part: 30
"The promotion of influenza vaccines is one of the most visible and aggressive public health policies at present ... A closer examination of influenza vaccination policies shows that, although the proponents employ the rhetoric of the In science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality and do not support the officials.
"The vaccine could be less beneficial and less safe than what has been claimed, and the threat of influenza seems exaggerated ... Mandatory vaccination policies have been enacted ... forcing some people to take the vaccine under the threat of losing your jobs
"The main claim of the CDC that fuels the momentum of influenza vaccines every year is that the flu carries the risk of serious complications that can cause death ...
"The only randomized trial of the influenza vaccine in the elderly found no decrease in deaths, which means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in the elderly despite clinical trials demonstrating reduced results. serious.
"Even when the vaccine matches the type of influenza that prevails ... randomized controlled trials of healthy adults found that vaccination between 33 and 100 people resulted in one less case of influenza ... For most people, and Possibly most doctors, officials need only claim that vaccines save lives, and there is supposed to be solid research behind this. "
Vaccination mandates against influenza for health workers are based on four invalid tests
A perfect example of what Doshi is talking about was published in January 2017. This scientific analysis31,32 of four randomly assigned Controlled tests, who claim that vaccinating health workers against influenza offers significant protection for patients, in fact they were exaggerated, and in general so.
According to the authors:
"By attributing the patient's benefit to the increased coverage of the influenza vaccine by health workers, it was found that each group randomized controlled trial violates the basic mathematical principle of dilution by reporting larger percentage reductions with fewer results of specific patients for influenza ... favorably predicted values derived by at least six to 15 times.
"If extrapolated to all long-term care facilities and hospital staff in the United States, the claimed number of previous randomized controlled trials needed to vaccinate 8 would unlikely mean that> 200,000 and> 675,000 deaths from Patients, respectively, can be prevented annually from influenza vaccination by health workers, which inconceivably surpasses mortality estimates of the total population of the US due to seasonal influenza each year, or during the 1918 pandemic , respectively.
"The most realistic recalibration based on actual patient data shows that at least 6,000 to 32,000 hospital workers would have to be vaccinated before the death of a single patient could be prevented."
The researchers concluded that these four trials, which are the basis of the forced vaccination policies of health workers "attribute incredibly large reductions in the patient's risk to vaccination of health workers, casting serious doubts about their validity ", and added that" The impression that has not been vaccinated "Health workers place their patients at a high risk of influenza is exaggerated.
Independent scientists can not obtain vaccine trial data
Europe also suffers from the same lack of transparency in vaccine research and public policy, as demonstrated by the failure of Cochrane scientists to obtain the vaccine trial data needed to assess the quality of 11 clinical trials in Vaccine against HPV held by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Detailed information on the design, conduct and outcome of a study can only be found in the trial's clinical trial (CSR) report, which pharmaceutical companies must submit when they apply for a new drug license. Reports from Transparimed.org: 33
"Since 2014, in theory, independent scientists can access these documents by filing a request with the European regulator, and in practice, the Cochrane team reports:
"'After three years, we obtained only 18 clinical trial reports (62 percent of the 29 EMA reports) ... Unfortunately, the reports still lacked important sections, such as protocols and reports of serious damage ... Only three reports included complete case report forms ... A study report of 4,263 pages was published in 17 files in seven lots in 12 months. "
In addition, the Cochrane scientists discovered that the EMA itself does not always receive all the scientific evidence, since some of the CSRs presented were incomplete. The team's attempts to obtain the CSR directly from the pharmaceutical companies were equally unsuccessful.
According to Cochrane:
"Although GlaxoSmithKline published versions of its clinical trial reports in its test record, the reports often lack narratives of serious adverse events and case report forms, and the data on serious adverse events in the reports we downloaded were reduced by big measure".
Needless to say, without access to CSRs, independent scientists, such as the Cochrane group, can not evaluate the benefits and harms of the drugs or vaccines under review with a significant degree of accuracy or confidence.
"From our point of view, independent researchers should be able to obtain complete and unwritten reports of clinical studies within a reasonable time frame without too many limitations," Cochrane writes.
"[R]the egulators must publish complete and coherent reports of clinical studies ... Urgent changes are essential for an open and transparent evaluation of the damages and benefits of the interventions ".
The teacher makes a strange claim for the 'vaccination rights' of children
In related news, Arthur L. Caplan, Ph.D., 34, a professor at the University of New York (NYU) and founding director of the Division of Medical Ethics at the NYU School of Medicine, looked up, stating that child presumed The right to be vaccinated replaces the legal right of parents to exercise informed consent for vaccination On behalf of the minor children.
In simple terms, Caplan believes that underage children should be vaccinated according to government recommendations, regardless of whether the parents have made an informed decision to refuse one or more vaccines for their children. As reported by The Vaccine Reaction, 35 Caplan "states that vaccinating children represents a higher moral imperative than respecting the informed consent rights of parents."
"'I want to point out a moral stance that I do not think has received enough attention, which is that all children have the right to be vaccinated,' said Caplan. 'We continue to talk about the right of parents to say yes or no', to avoid mandates or requirements, or to do what they decide to do.Somebody has to talk and say: "Well, what about the children? Do not they have any rights? "
"Caplan believes that if parents refuse to vaccinate their children, the government has the right to override the legal right of parents to make health care decisions for their children." Caplan maintains that the government has a duty to vaccinate children. children without the consent of the parents, and by force, if necessary. "
In other words, what Caplan is saying is that parents should be prevented from making health care decisions, especially vaccination decisions, on behalf of their minor children if those decisions do not conform to government policy. What kind of freedom is that? Coming from a self-appointed medical ethic, this is something terrifying and amazing. It is barely one step away from all children being treated as government property.
Disturbingly, attempts to advance this type of public health policy and the law are already underway, and parents around the world must join the fight to preserve their right to make medical decisions for their youngest children. If government officials can vaccinate their child against their will, it is not known where it will end. As reported by the vaccine reaction:
"Legislation has been introduced in states like California that would seek to grant the government the right to make health care decisions for children, even against the wishes of their parents, if the state believes that the decisions are in the best interest of the children. children.
"Such legislation would also allow government authorities to take physical legal custody of children in cases where the parents refuse to comply with the mandates that obligate or force them to vaccinate their children.
"The impetus for Caplan's thought process is that, at least when it comes to the vaccination of children, parents should be stripped of their informed consent rights." Apparently, Caplan opines that informed decisions about medical care What parents take for their children is simply not relevant if those decisions conflict with government policy.
"But it is precisely this' long-standing legal right to make informed and voluntary decisions about pharmaceutical products and medical procedures that carry risks for their children, 'says Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center, which is' all that There is between the parents and the exploitation of their children by those in positions of power in society with a personal or professional interest in forcing all children to use pharmaceutical products that are not safe or effective for all children. "
By Dr. Joseph Mercola, Guest Author
From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the growing number of visitors to Mercola.com Since I started the site in 1997, now we are routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet, it convinces me that you are also fed up with your deception. You want practical health solutions without exaggeration, and that's what I offer.
References:
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); .
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario