Montana: The Navy plans to build a Supercoast. They would have sold for scrap metal.
Montana: The Navy plans to build a Supercoast. They would have sold for scrap metal.
The mountains had little to contribute. Slower than the Iowas, but with roughly the same anti-aircraft weaponry, they could not carry out the escort mission of the transporters more effectively. However, they would occupy material and space in the courtyard dedicated to carriers and escort boats.
In the early 1940s, The United States Navy still hopes that it needs great first class warships to fight against the best that Japan and Germany have to offer. . The battleships of North Carolina, South Dakota and Iowa all involved design commitments. The Montanas, the last battleships designed by the United States Navy (USN), would not do it.
(This appeared for the first time several years ago.)
Origins of the design:
The system of war between the naval treaties allowed the United States to restart the construction of the battleship at the end of the 1930s. The first designs (the classes of North Carolina and South Dakota) complied with the treaty restrictions, which limited the size of the battleship to 35,000 tons. An escalator clause came into action after Japan did not renew its treaty obligations, allowing the construction of the Iowa class of 45,000, which would use the additional displacement to carry slightly heavier weapons and, more importantly, , add five knots of speed.
The fast and thin ships of class Iowas. However, it was separated from the historical practice in the construction of battleships in the United States. Unlike their counterparts in other countries, the admirals of American battleships preferred to sacrifice speed for firepower and protection. The USN never built a battle cruiser (although it intended to do so after the First World War), and initially expected its replacement battleships to sail at 23 knots, four knots slower than any other contemporary foreigner. The USN rose to 28 when it realized that foreign armies were building ships that could reach 30 knots. The Iowas could make 33 knots (at least on paper) because the USN wanted battleships that could escort their new fast carriers.
The Montanas did not retreat until the 23rd, but they did represent a step back to the precedent established by the classes of North Carolina and South Dakota. They displaced 18,000 tons more than the Iowas, but spent that displacement on the armor and the main battery, instead of on the speed. Crucially, the USN made the decision to build them too large to pass through the Panama Canal, which Japanese designers of the time believed was a hard ceiling for the size of American battleships.
Name (s:
The five names selected were Montana, Ohio, Maine, New Hampshire and Louisiana. Of these, the last four recycled names of pre-dreadnought battleships, all of which had been discarded after the First World War. The first, Montana, recycled a name that was originally intended for the first class of battleships in South Dakota, which was canceled in the wake of the Naval Treaty of Washington. Apart from Hawaii, Montana is the only state that has never had an operational battleship named in its honor.
How they stack:
In appearance, the Montanas were very similar to those of the Iowa class, with the greatest visible differences in size and main armament. The Montanas would have transported 12 16 "/ 50 guns in four triple towers, and would have displaced around 65,000 tons. They had to wear a 16 "belt armor and a 9" deck armor, a substantial increase in the Iowas. However, they could only make 28 knots. The secondary armament was largely the same as the Iowas (and the earlier battleship classes), but with more space on the deck, they could eventually have carried a heavier anti-aircraft weaponry.
The Montanas would have surpassed anything the British, French or Italians had conceived to build. The most obvious opponent for the Montanas were the Japanese Yamatos. The Montanas would have been a little faster than the Yamatos, with a much heavier side. Weapons of 16 "/ 50 had greater penetration power than Japanese weapons of 18.1", which gives the ships of the United States a significant advantage. Advances in radar fire control and in the scope of the search. It would also have worked for the benefit of United States vessels.
Recommended: Imagine a US air force UU Who never built the B-52 bomber
Recommended: The next big military sale of Russia - to Mexico?
Recommended: Would China really invade Taiwan?
However, it is worth noting that the Yamatos were commissioned in 1942, prior to the placement of Montana's scheduled keel. Even given the exceptionally rapid construction schedule of the United States warships in World War II, Montana would have entered service some three years after the Yamatos, making the comparison imprecise. On the other hand, battleships notional tracking (" Super Yamato "and" Super Duper Yamato " as they are known colloquially, they would have substantially exceeded the mountains of size and armament.
Apart from the Japanese, the only serious competitors in the "super-armored" weight category were the Soviet class Sovetsky Soyuz and the German class H-39. Both types were almost as large as American and Japanese ships, and they carried 16 "guns." However, both Soviet and German designs had great shortcomings, and in the Soviet case the industrial deficiencies meant that the ships would have suffered great problems. In any case, the arrival of the war led to the cancellation of all classes of super battleships, except the first two Yamatos.
.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario