Man's journey to the Moon: THE TRUTH (Conspiracy or Fact?)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyEdDRAG8S_Hdmuees-nVBSbmKZwEMqS0Vnfmm2XlmQ-nnAjWv96R9IZ7ThZMXtJ37VRMrNIbPMzJP-7z1xr2gDNdWFbNNOZROPF8VTDYIX9TZhaOCR_GMsmXSPO212rJYTyWYwfgKHoQ/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Viaje+a+la+luna.jpg
Man's journey to the Moon: THE TRUTH (Conspiracy or Fact?)
The manned trips to the Moon are a great controversy among some in its veracity, the issue is that there were and there are people who say that the greatest step of humanity was not possible for different reasons, creating what has been termed as the " Conspiracy Theory of Man's Journey to the Moon "; which states that the man did not go to the Moon since the images broadcast live for everyone were edited in a set by NASA, as well as the photographs taken and stones collected from the Moon during the trips were falsified, since there are several impediments for a human being to pose on the moon (according to the theory of conspiracy).
All this leads to millions of people around the world really believe that NASA conspired at the expense of the entire world to increase their spirit of greatness, economic and technological power over all the nations of the planet. On the other hand, space agencies from all over the world, the international scientific community and above all the USSR, credit that NASA really took man to the Moon.
Next, 25 series of hypotheses are exposed in the conspiracy theory of the man's trip to the Moon and its real counterpart, denying each and every one of these hypotheses, then more reasons for the veracity of the trip and finally the verdict:
1. Flag waving:
Why does the American flag wave in some photographs and videos if there is no wind on the Moon?
The truth:
In the photographs it can be seen that the flag has an upper pole for the flag to remain extended (View image toFlag with top mast), because if it did not have it, it would fall by gravity in the absence of wind on the Moon (View image toFlag illustration fall without wind). The flag was moving since the astronauts placed it, shaking it a bit, looking like it was undulating due to the wrinkles that it had because the flag was folded during the trip to the Moon, in addition to having almost no atmosphere any object does not find friction with the wind since this does not exist which causes the flag to continue moving a few moments after having placed it, (this is a matter of physics, inertia without friction). In the videos recorded on the Moon, it can be seen that the flag is completely still shortly after the astronauts stop moving it, and it remained that way while the astronauts did not move it.
2. Photographs damaged by radiation:
The astronauts took thousands of photographs, all of them perfectly exposed and focused. The spare rolls were not affected by the intense cosmic radiation on the Moon, a condition that should have damaged them. They managed to adjust their cameras, change the rolls and change filters with their pressurized suits.
The truth:
Many of the photographs have defects, are out of focus or veiled. The miniaturization of the portable cameras that were modified at the request of the manufacturer (Hasselblad) represented a great technological leap, so that they could face the vacuum and radiation conditions that take place in space. On the other hand the cameras carried hermetic rolls and when the film was worn they were not changed as the controversy argues.
3. False photos:
There are photographers who claim that the photos are false. Many of the photos of the lunar landscapes of NASA do not have parallel shadows. This type of shadows can only be created with several sources of light or with a near focus, but the only source of light on the Moon is the Sun.
The truth:
If there were several sources of light astronauts and objects would have more than one shadow, which does not happen. Non-parallel shadows occur due to the "perspective effect" that also happens on Earth. In addition, the shadows do not have to be parallel in an irregular terrain, as is the case of the Moon.
4. Bright sign.
The sign with the flag and the words "United States" always shine, even when everything is dark around. Some of the still photographs do not fit with the video shots; however, NASA claims that it took them at the same time.
The truth:
Since on the Moon it was day, the lunar surface reflects part of the Sun's light, illuminating the darkened parts of the module, whose material was also reflective (it's like here on Earth when the Sun rises in the morning and the light It goes directly to the back of a car, so that a shadow is reflected in the front of the car, but that does not mean that you will not be able to visibly perceive the front plate of the car). It is not true that the photographs do not match the recorded videos. Scientists and geologists from around the world have analyzed them for decades, without finding any anomaly.
5. Deadly solar eruption:
The outer space is flooded with deadly radiation emanating from the Sun; however, no astronaut contracted cancer. Not even the crew of Apollo 16, who were going in the direction of the Moon when there was a solar bulge that should have roasted them literally.
The truth:
There is no record of a major solar eruption during the flight of Apollo 16. There were several in August 1972, after the Apollo 16 would have returned (in April) and before the flight of the Apollo 17 (in December of the same year)
Jack Swigert, from the mission Apollo 13, died of bone cancer several years after his trip to the moon, shortly before taking office as a deputy for Colorado, although you can not know if his illness could be due to space travel.
6. No landing footprint:
The lander weighed 17 tons; even so, it does not leave on the Moon traces as deep as those of the footsteps of the astronauts. Not even the powerful propeller rocket of the lander leaves traces under it. He must have created a crater under the rocket;9 however, it seems never to have turned on. The conspiracy plaintiffs believe that the engines would have at least enough power to lift the dust under the module when it landed. If this is true, how did the famous prints of Armstrong's boots occur if all the dust had been blown? The truth:
The lunar module weighed between 15,061 kg on Earth. On the Moon, gravity is about six times smaller, and the fuel that was spent before landing was a good part of the weight, so the weight of the module on the surface of the Moon was 2,033 kg.
The idea that a crater must have formed under the lunar module is wrong and based on pure speculation. Seconds before the moon landed, the module only had to counteract its weight so as not to collide with the lunar surface but descend smoothly on it, the motor of the module had to provide a little less push than the weight of the mass of the module descending on the Moon.
The pressure diminished even more due to the rapid expansion of the gases in the vacuum, so it was not enough to create a crater, but it was enough to raise some lunar dust, as shown in the recordings of the landings made from the window of the module and slightly alter the floor (View image toPhoto small alteration of the surface).
7. There are no stars:
It is argued that the absence of stars in the photographs of the Moon is unacceptable, despite the lack of atmosphere to obscure the vision. Yuri Gagarin said that the stars were tremendously bright. However, NASA photographs do not show stars in the lunar sky. It is alleged that the reason why stars do not appear in the photos is because the astronomers would calculate their positions and configuration and notice something wrong; therefore, assembly without stars was easier to handle.
The truth:
It was daytime on the Moon, just as on Earth we can not see the stars by day, only at night. The lunar sky looks dark not because it is night but because it has almost no atmosphere, so that it can not reflect any light (as on Earth the sky is blue by the light of the Sun reflected in the atmosphere) and in the photos and videos you can see that the lunar surface is illuminated, which proves that it was daytime in the place that landed.
In addition, stars do not appear in photographs taken from the space shuttle, the Mir space station wave International Space Station. The reason is that they are too weak to be captured in the photographic image. An exposure time of more than 20 seconds is necessary, and the exposure time of the photographs of the Apollo missions was a fraction of a second. The spatial photographs in which stars appear are of long exposure.
8. Poisonous gases:
The purity of the oxygen in the lunar module would have melted the cover of the Hasselblad camera, producing poisonous gases. Why did nothing happen to the astronauts?
The truth:
The cover of the Hasselblad cameras used in the Apollo flights was not the same as that of the normal units that Hasselblad sold. It was modified to adapt it to the conditions that were to be found in space.
9. Flames in a vacuum:
The accusers of the conspiracy claim that a flame can not be produced in a vacuum due to lack of oxygen. However, shots of the Apollo 11 module show flames emerging from the nozzle.
The truth:
The fuel of lunar module was hydrazine, which reacted spontaneously in contact with Dinitrogen tetroxide, without the need for oxygen or spark. Actually, the lunar module engine images do not show a flame practically. As is well known by chemical engineers, hydrazine is a hypergolic fuel, that is, it does not produce a flame when burned.
10. False fingerprints:
The fingerprints are false because in order to produce it is needed the air that displaces the weight (air that is not on the Moon) or the humidity between the particles of dust and sand.
The truth:
It is not necessary that there is humidity or air to leave footprints in a ground.
11. Improved images:
The television images of Apollo 11 were pretty bad; however, these magically improved in the following missions
The truth:
Apollo 11 did not use a high gain antenna like the ones used in later missions. This antenna was capable of transmitting color images of better quality than those of Apollo 11.
12. Clear background:
Why do most of the pictures of Apollo missions on the Moon have clear lines of definition between the front and the bottom?
The truth:
It is logical to expect a greater clarity in the lunar photographs. Almost devoid of atmosphere, distant objects such as mountains and craters are not as blurred as here on Earth with a dense atmosphere and especially in a city with a high pollution.
13. Rock "C":
Why does one of the photographs show a rock marked with the letter "C" on top of another "C" marked on the lunar soil?
The truth:
Actually the "C" is a hair introduced during the development, as demonstrated by the enlargement of the image made by the Lunar and Planetary Institute. The image that contains the "C" is not the original, it is one of the many copies of each photograph. The "C" does not appear in any of the originals of the photograph nor in any of the copies of the previous photograph (View image toPhotography without the "C"), taken a few seconds apart, and showing the same rock. These hairs or fibers appear in other photographs, due to the same reason, such as a copy of the image (View image toCopy image), which shows even four hairs. The similar mark that seems to be seen on the floor is formed by the shadow of smaller stones, and similar shadows can be found in other lunar photographs, which can be confused by "pareidolia" (see or shape something that really is not (View image toClock with sad face) or (View image toJesus in a coffee cup) or (View image toFace in the sink)).
14. Re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere:
How was it that the fiberglass antenna of the "Gemini 6A "(capsule in which the astronauts returned to Earth) survived the tremendous heat when entering the atmosphere again?
The truth:
The antenna was retractable and was in retracted position during reentry.
15. Overheated ship:
 |
Movie Image Apollo 13
with Tom Hanks in which he supports
the low temperatures of space. |
Conspiracy theory:In the Ron Howard movie Apollo 13 (of 1995), the astronauts lose the electrical energy and they begin to worry about dying frozen while they go back to the Earth in the spaceship. But they were subjected to the constant bombardment of the sun's rays that would quickly heat the vehicle to lethal temperatures without an atmosphere in which to dissipate the heat in the vacuum of space.
The truth:
It is false that an object can only dissipate heat in the atmosphere, it can dissipate heat in the form of radiation in the vacuum of space. It is a very basic concept of thermodynamics. Although a spaceship is being heated on the one hand, the half that is in shadow dissipates heat to the vacuum of space.
16. Without landing trials:
Who would risk using the lunar module on the Moon when simulation tests of the moon landing were never carried out?
The truth:
Of course, the moon landing tests were done, both on Earth and in space. The crew of Apollo 9 flew the lunar module in Earth orbit, and the Apollo 10 he tested the lunar module a few kilometers above the lunar surface.
In addition Earth tests were made of the moon landing with vehicles called "Lunar Landing Research Vehicle" with several astronauts, including Neil Armstrong himself.
_Video_ Neil Armstrong testing the "Lunar Landing Research Vehicle" days before going to the Moon:
http://www.youtube.com/v/ZtdwrxVTUhk?version=3
17. Lunar module unable to leave the Moon:
The lunar module by its weight and size was not able to escape the gravity of the Moon and did not contain enough fuel to do so.
The truth:
The calculations to verify the capacity of a ship to be placed in orbit are simple, and can be found in specialized pages. Obviously, the Soviet scientists were most interested in proving it, and neither they nor the huge number of aeronautical engineers from the rest of the world has reported any anomaly.
There is a tendency to erroneously compare the power needed to put the space shuttle into Earth orbit with the lunar module. On the Moon it is not necessary to overcome the resistance of the atmosphere, since it is practically non-existent and gravity is one sixth of the Earth's.
In addition, the lunar module only needed to be placed in lunar orbit, since the final impulse to escape the gravity of the Moon and return to Earth, was provided by the command module that orbited the Moon with another astronaut to whom the module would be coupled Moon after having taken off from the Moon with the other 2 astronauts.
18. Small jumps:
Instead of being able to jump 3 meters (10 feet) in a gravity of one sixth of the terrestrial one, the astronauts' highest jump was 50 cm (19 inches).
The truth:
Having risk of breakage of the suit by a bad fall, the astronauts avoided making exaggerated movements. It is not true that the highest jump was 19 inches (50 cm), as reported Neil Armstrong, he came to jump 5 or 6 feet high (1.5 and 1.8 meters respectively), but stopped trying because of the risk of falling. In addition to the pre-moon landing on Earth, astronauts were instructed about this possible risk.
19. Slow jumps:
Although the slow movement of the videos have a convincing appearance of low gravity, the fact that the astronauts moved between steps a distance similar to that of the steps on Earth could not be disguised.
The truth:
The defenders of the counterfeiting of the moon landings allege that the appearance of absence of gravity was made with a series of cables from which the astronauts hung and then passed in slow motion. The fact that the distance of the steps is greater or lesser is a somewhat subjective question on which there can be several interpretations. However, the dust raised by the wheels of lunar rover they describe a perfect parabola and then fall on the lunar soil, due to the absence of air. On Earth that does not happen; the air causes the dust to rise and float. There is still not enough technology to imitate the vacuum conditions on Earth for something similar to take place.
20. The rover without rollovers:
If the rover (a car-like lunar vehicle) was moving on a gravity of one sixth, then it must have required a width of 20 feet (6 meters) to prevent it from rolling over at each curve, but the moon rot had the same size than a normal car.
The truth:
The only thing that had seemed like lunar róver with a normal car was the size; it measured 3.1 × 1.8 meters, its wheels were 81 cm in diameter, its weight was 209 kg on Earth and 34.7 kg on the Moon. It was a complex engineering job. To prevent it from capsizing, the speed limit was limited to 14 km / h, and it had four-wheel drive. It was also designed to be able to climb hills of up to 30 degrees. They used very light materials for their construction, and could hold up to twice their own weight. It was used in missions Apollo 15, Apollo 16 Y Apollo 17. Design and construction was carried out by the company of aircraft Boeing In addition, the center of gravity of the rover was located very low to not overturn (like a trailer (truck, tractor, gandola in Venezuela, tractomula in Colombia or harrow in Honduras) have their low center of gravity with heavy steel beams in the base of the box to avoid rollover in curves).
21. High radiation doses of Van Allen Belts:
An astrophysicist who worked for NASA wrote that a shield two meters thick is needed to protect against solar protrusions and that the largest solar protuberances emit tens of thousands of ReM In an hour. Russian scientists calculated in 1959 that the astronauts needed a shield 4 feet thick (1.2 meters) to protect them on the lunar surface. Why mission astronauts Apollo Did they not die after being exposed to that immense radiation? And why only now does NASA begin to study a method to measure radiation levels on the Moon and the effects on humans if they already did that before?
The truth:
The argument refers to the scientist John Mauldin, however Mauldin's quotation referred to interstellar travel (outside the Solar System), where the radiation is much greater and is received much longer than in trips to the Moon.
The so-called Soviet study of 1959, which states that a 4-foot-thick (1.2 meter) shield against radiation is needed, simply does not exist, since no conspiracy theorist has been able to give references to it. The fact that the design of the Russian ship destined for the lunar voyage manned in the sixties was similar to that of the Apollo ship, proves that a shield of that thickness was not necessary. The Russians abandoned their manned lunar program in the early 1970s for various reasons, including economic ones. In the Apollo missions, the astronauts carried dosimeters to measure the level of radiation, but did not conduct an exhaustive study of the radiation on the Moon. Currently this is done by unmanned probes, because it is important to know more accurately, for a future permanent stay on the Moon.
The planet Earth is covered by 2 large toroidal radiation belts called Van Allen, and even though the astronauts themselves were exposed to a certain amount of radiation, it was not enough to kill them.
The radiation for flying 12 hours in an airplane at 12,000 m height is .006 ReM, the radiation to which an average person in the world is exposed is .24 ReM per year, the radiation received by the travel crew by constant aircraft is .22 ReM per year, the crew of Apollo 7 (which did not leave Earth orbit) received a radiation of .4 ReM throughout the mission, the average of the received radiation emissions by the crew of all the Apollo missions was 1.2 ReM, the recommended level of radiation for a nuclear plant worker is 2.25 ReM per year and its maximum level of 5 ReM per year, the crew that received the most radiation was that of Apollo 14 which was 2.85 ReM in total during the entire mission (the equivalent in radiation that an average person receives during 12 years of life on Earth). Which indicates that despite being a strong radiation, it is still far from being a deadly radiation in which it would take 1,000 ReM to kill the astronauts (equivalent to almost 850 trips to the same astronaut's Moon or fly 2'000,000 of hours (228 years) on an airplane at 12,000 m height). (View image toTable of damages by radiation level in ReM).
22. Space suits not suitable for space:
The fabric of the Space suits is targeted with zippers There must have been air leaks since even a pinhole deflates a tire in a short time.
The truth:
The outer zipper of the suit was not the one that retained the air pressure. The suits were composed of more than a dozen micro-thin layers that fulfilled different functions. The innermost one retained the pressure by means of rubber joints, just like in the current suits.
23. A lot of pressure inside the space suit:
Astronauts who wore these pressurized suits could bend their fingers, wrists and knees easily at a pressure of 5.2 PSI (pounds per square inch), yet the speed of a punching ball (punching ball) is virtually impossible to bend to a pressure of 4 PSI. The astronauts would look like balloons if their suits had been pressurized to those levels.
The truth:
The internal pressure of the Apollo suits is similar to that of the current space suits, which NASA astronauts use in the spacewalks of the space shuttle and the International Space Station. And there is no problem of this kind. The joints that need flexibility (elbows, knees, etc.) have a design crossed by folds that allows to bend them slightly.
In addition, the atmospheric pressure on Earth is 1 atm = 14.7 PSI, which would indicate that in the space suit there is a third of the pressure on Earth, which results in a movement more easily, being wrong that at 4 PSI the astronauts can not move with their space suits on.
24. They did not take any telescope to the Moon:
If NASA took the trouble to take several million dollars worth of rovers to the moon, did you ever bother taking telescopes to photograph the stars without atmospheric interference? Something that was the dream of many astronomers. How could they ignore this?
The truth:
False. The astronauts of Apollo 16 they brought to the surface of the Moon a Ultraviolet light telescope, which obtained 178 images from various regions of the sky during their stay. The results of this experiment were published in the "Apollo 16 Preliminary Science Report " (See document to "Apollo 16 Preliminary Science Report ") and in the magazine "Science "in 1972 (G. R. Carruthers, and T. Page:" Apollo 16 far-ultraviolet camera / spectrograph - Earth observations ", in journal Science, pp. 788-791, vol. 177, September 1972).
25. Proof that the moon landing was mounted in a set:
A secret video brought to light shows that the historic scene of the arrival of man on the Moon on July 20, 1969, would have been a fraud. It shows that one of the astronauts is coming down from the lunar module when a focus of the scenery falls. Immediately enter the set a series of technicians to fix the damage and continue with the recording.
The truth:
The video is false, and has even deserved an entry in the reference page on urban legends Snopes.com. The video appeared on the page moontruth.com, where after showing it was specified that it was a joke. The original page has disappeared, but it can be consulted in the Internet Archive, an organization that keeps a cache version of millions of Internet pages since 1996.
More reasons for the veracity of man's journey to the Moon:
An example of the difficulties in providing scientific evidence of the human moon landing is the fact that Apollo 11, 14 and 15 missions left retroreflectors on the lunar surface, which were part of the team of experiments (ALSEP), where scientists can reflect laser beams to measure the distance from Earth to the Moon. These reflectors are usually offered as evidence of moon landings, but the conspiracy plaintiffs allege that the reflectors could be left there for unmanned missions. The Russian mission Lunokhod, for example, left a French mirror on the surface of the Moon, but the main point is that the mechanical remains can not be used, which remains as evidence of the true human moon landing.
USSR
The Soviet Union was in the middle of the Cold War with the United States, and one of the lands was the space, in which every small conquest in terms of space flights gave more spirit of greatness and world power to that country that achieved first, in what was called the space race, between the main methane that faced to perform first were: first satellite in orbit, first man in space, first spacecraft manned in orbit, first spacewalk, first space probes in to reach the Moon, Venus and Mars, the first man to orbit the Moon and the first man on the Moon and return it to the Earth alive and well. Analyzing the context of the space race, the USSR would first refute the veracity of man's journey to the Moon, but as they knew very well because they could follow him through their instruments, those manned trips to the Moon were true. POT.
Emissions by radio telescopes:
The telecommunications of the Apollo missions were received by large radio telescopes in different parts of the planet so that communication with the ships would not be lost due to the rotation of the Earth, among them the Parkes Radio Telescope of the Parkes Observatory in Australia (famous for the movie "The Dish") which received the first images of the Apollo 11 moon landing. This shows that there were people who were perceiving the Apollo trip live all over the world.
Observations by telescopes:
Observations have been made by telescopes that show the landing site of the apollo ships, in which the remains of the missions can be seen.
The lunar rocks brought to Earth are one of the most irrefutable signs of the truth of the trip to the Moon, since despite the fact that the people who are in favor of the theory of the conspiracy affirm that they could be created from terrestrial rocks , these are impossible to recreate, since its surface is literally bombarded by the action of small micrometeorites over millions of years, and they contain isotopes of some elements in proportions different from those on Earth. In addition, the lunar rocks brought by the Apollo flights have the same characteristics as the samples collected by the automatic lunar probes of the USSR.
 |
Apollo 11 astronauts
Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin. |
Astronauts:Although many people do not consider it that way, the testimony of the astronauts is a fundamental piece, any psychologist would support the veracity of their stories.
Comunidad científica internacional: Toda la comunidad que verdaderamente es científica avalan que el hombre realmente llego a la Luna, nadie mejor que ellos lo saben, puesto que conocen de ingeniería, astrofísica, tecnología y demás.
Todas y cada una de las agencias espaciales del mundo acreditan que el hombre realmente llegó a la Luna, puesto que ellos son expertos en materia espacial saben precisamente todo lo que es necesario para que haya habido un viaje tripulado a la Luna, lo cual se cumplió.
Millones de dólares invertidos para que el hombre llegara a la Luna no pudieron haberse ido por la borda, menos cuando se ve patentemente todos los experimentos, estudios y construcciones de instalaciones, equipo, cohetes y naves que hubo. En total en el programa Apolo se invirtieron US $25,400’000,000 de 1973 y equivalentes en dinero del 2005 serían US $170,000’000,000.
Sobre todo de las otras, ésta es la prueba más grande prueba de la llegada del hombre a la Luna, puesto que durante el programa Apolo la NASA creó miles de patentes que no fueron otra cosa que en gran adelanto tecnológico que este viaje conllevó.
Gracias que fue posible el programa que el viaje del hombre a la Luna, es que usamos de la tecnología que hoy por hoy disfrutamos y que están al alcance de todos, si no hubiera existido la carrera espacial es posible que en pleno año 2011 estuviéramos usando tecnología de los años 80’s, llevando un radio enorme sobre los hombros para escuchar música en vez de un pequeño reproductor táctil con conexión a internet, o teléfonos fijos en vez de móviles, uso del internet para todos por medio de la Web, y sobretodo adelantos en materiales, que en total forman parte de los literalmente millones de artículos que se crearon con base en la tecnología espacial del programa Apolo que hizo posible la llegada del hombre a la Luna.
Conclusión:
El viaje del hombre a la Luna fue:
¡Verdadero! No caben dudas.
Quien afirme lo contrario una de dos:
 |
Bill Kaysing, unos de los principales
en la teoría de conspiración del viaje
a la Luna y autor de libro: "We never
went to the moon" (Nunca fuimos
a la Luna). |
1. Tiene algún interés para afirmar tales barbaridades negando tal hecho y hacer creer tal cosa a millones de crédulos para obtener ventaja de ellos (económica, política, social o de reconocimiento), siento estos normalmente los creadores de la teoría misma o gente arriada para difundir tal cosa (que en la mayoría de los casos por dentro ni ellos mismos se la creen).
2. Gente crédula que ingenuamente se cree de lo que los conspiradores afirman, sin tener una base concreta de esas afirmaciones, siendo ignorantes del potencial tecnológico que tuvo la humanidad en los años 60’s y de la historia misma, puesto que en las décadas pasadas se fueron estableciendo tecnologías muy avanzadas que hicieron posible lo imposible: llevar al hombre a la Luna y tráelo de vuelta a la Tierra sano y salvo.
Habiendo sido 12 astronautas que pisaron la superficie lunar en 7 viajes:
Apolo 11 (20 de julio de 1969):
Neil Armstrong y Buzz Aldrin.
Apolo 12 (19 de noviembre de 1969):
Pete Conrad y Alan Bean.
Apolo 14 (5 de febrero de 1971):
Alan shephard y Edgar Michell.
Apolo 15 (30 de julio de 1971):
David Scott y Jim Irwin.
Apolo 16 (21 de abril de 1972):
John Young y Charlie Duke.
Apolo 17 (11 de diciembre de 1972):
Eugene Cernan y Harrison Schmitt.
| Comparte este artículo en: |
|
|
.
SOURCE LINK THE BEST ONLINE UFO WEBSITES
https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario