Has Israel effectively colonized the United States?
Has Israel effectively colonized the United States?
Israel may be small, but so was Britain when it controlled India. Israel does not need to control everything in the US UU., Only the important ...
Israel may be small, but so was Britain when it controlled India. Israel does not need to control everything in the US UU., Only the important things: AIPAC (with the help of Zionist Christians) controls the policy of the Middle East and maintains the flow of aid by controlling all branches of government; the "anti-Semitic" label is used as a weapon; the media are far from any significant criticism of Israel; and "exceptionalism" allows the Jewish state to renounce the rules that all other countries on the planet must obey.by Badruddin Khan, (extract)
Normally we think that colonizers are large countries and colonized as smaller and weaker nations. But this is not always the case. Colonization does not require occupation.. It simply requires the subjugation of the colonized.
With ambition, superior information and calculations and the right mindset, smaller nations can (and have had in the past) colonize and dominate larger and nominally more powerful countries.
India was successfully colonized by the small Britain in the eighteenth century. The vehicle for colonization was the East India Company.[whichone[which[cual[whichMayer Rothschild had significant control of]. It was only after the Indian riot that Britain acted directly and sent troops to establish the British Raj.For the next 200 years, India lost its wealth, its economy restructured to support the needs and global ambitions of England, and its people were militarized to fight and die in the name of the British crown.
The Indian leaders who remained were willing to participate in this venture; those who felt otherwise were destroyed or marginalized.
In a similar line, today Israel is in the process of colonizing the United States, which is vital for its global projection and the exercise of power.
The steps that Israel is taking are visible to all (as in the case of British designs in India) and, however, it is very difficult to connect the points while such a takeover is taking place. Or, to do something about it.
Colonization does not mean total control of everything.
It means total control of what matters. The British were interested in the wealth of the Indians and a permanent army of Indians willing to die for their wars. They could not care less about the small internal policies of India that did not have a direct or indirect impact on their mission.
An effective "divide and conquer" strategy will pit the Indians against each other and discourage any kind of coordinated response or sedition.
The British took advantage of their "external advantage" to collect objectively data with which to calculate and coordinate which Indian princes to support in the battles and with what to connote. Like pieces on a chessboard, the Indian leaders were exhausted through internal battles, and were forced to seek coverage provided by the British.
Small amounts of leverage can change the results (as shown by the Israeli lobby AIPAC, on its way to dominate Congress and the regional / local policy of the US) and, over the years, the British could control and align India with the British Crown.
Less than 10,000 Englishmen controlled colonial India, which at that time had a population of 300 million.
It is instructive to keep in mind that, while there were relatively few white English people, a class of local "brown sahibs" was developed to manage things. This elite class was educated in English, and rewarded monetarily and with social stature.
Britain was too small a country to be ultimately important, but by taking advantage of India, the British could pursue their global ambitions. India was the "jewel in the Crown (British)"
Today, Israel has effective control of United States policy in the Middle East and similar objectives. Much has been written about the control of Congress by Israel. Israel is now moving towards control over the Executive Power of the United States. UU., With both presidential candidates backed by billionaires whose main agenda is Israel (Saban and Adelson).
The Supreme Court will be a third of Jews, and judges have links to the community and families. As Israel demonstrated through its successful intimidation of Judge Goldstone, jurists are human and all have their price.
The "occupation force" of Israel in the USA UU It has included AIPAC for a long time, as well as the dense network of community organizations at the state and local levels.
Through relationships that have developed over the years and with unlimited funds at their disposal, the "Israel Lobby" guarantees that the votes go the right way and that the opponents are crushed when Israel demands unity.
In 2003 at the beginning of George Bush's Iraq War This occupation force multiplied through the inclusion of Christians. Zionists.
Critics of Israel's lobby are marginalized by any means available, including being called anti-Semites. The Lobby has been effective in securing massive aid packages for Israel despite the fact that Israel's GDP per capita exceeds that of several European nations.
The Israeli initiates permeate the government of the United States, and the policy of the United States is that there is no "light" between the countries, so as far as Israel is concerned, there is no debate.
Israel's main priorities are the main priorities of the United States. Of course, there are cases in which this does not happen (like Iran), but the direction points to a tighter colonial bond in the coming years.
The media matters: establishing beliefs and narratives.
The colonizer must be a "Holy Object" above the critical or objective review, and dangerous critics must be destroyed or marginalized. No English in India spoke of the motherland and its forms with nothing but reverence, even though during the periods of British Britain it was in crisis.
Within England there was a free press and an active debate; but this was not allowed in India, on Great Britain. The only acceptable position was that of reverence.
Today Israel has a free press, and it is easy to read the translations of the press in Hebrew. Israeli commentators compare Netanyahu with Hitler, Israel is called a racist apartheid state based on evidence, and Extreme violence against and continuous abuses of the Palestinians. It is well documented.
But, these same conversations are prohibited in the United States. No newspaper would report them, nor are they allowed in an educated company. Transgressors are labeled as anti-Semitic., whether Jewish or not.
In the United States today, boycotts are seen as a permissible non-violent form of free expression. Citizens have the right to boycott whatever they want from wherever they want without the risk of sanctions. The only exception is Israel..
Exceptionalism
The British conquests were "for God and for the country," and therefore justified. The British were superior, the inferior natives. This set the moral justification for the chaos caused by the British when they colonized Asia and the Middle East.
At that time, not all men were born equal, and the Constitution of the United States. UU He had to establish that obvious fact for himself.
Israel is trying to go back to those days, acting as if the Arab lives were inferior and (more recently) promoting Islamophobia to serve its Christians. Zionism to. In 2003, super Zionist. Bernard Lewis he pretended to be an "Arab expert" and advised President Bush that the only language the Arabs understood was force.
This helped to justify the attack on Iraq, as part of a neoconservative plan to "creatively destroy" the sovereign Arab states in Israel's neighborhood, to facilitate Israel's domination. The Nazis in Nuremberg showed more respect than Saddam and his Ba'at leadership, and disdain for the Arabs was in full display.
Today, Israeli Jews are in the process of destroying Palestinian society and erasing Palestinian culture, with impunity. Churches and mosques are being destroyed, although Israel would prefer to focus attention on mosques, to fan the religious war between Islam on the one hand and Christians and Jews on the other.
While the Israeli press records and discusses Israel's misbehavior, Americans are prohibited from publicly debating Israeli behavior in a critical manner. (...)
The colonization of the United States by Israel is increasingly explicit.. Now it is increasingly seen as "normal" to have a double standard: one for Israel, one for the rest of the world. The boycott movement to Israel is an example of that: you can boycott any person or person, but not Israel. This is the true power, and the face of colonization.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); .
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario