Exociencia: The lie with a science mask
Exociencia: The lie with a science mask
Saying that a "study" says something about something is becoming fashionable, but these supposed "studies" that claim to be more up-to-date and that presume to go against what they call "official science", is what within the The mafia of the conspiranists is called the science.According to the "arguments" of these "disseminators", science is the "alternative science that does not obey official science", but there is a more extensive "definition" that says: "It is the science that explains the Universe, understood as a multiversal whole to which we belong and which covers each and every one of the specific manifestations in which it manifests itself, including the unquestionable presence of other intelligences, as well as each and every one of the manifestations, material and / or antimaterial, energy processes and / or quantum involved in it. "
We are facing a clear example of neo-obscurantism that intoxicates social networks, the internet and other media; it is a pseudo-science cluster that is based on well-adhered fallacies and sophisms to give the appearance of seriousness and formality. Let's check it
Let's start with the fact that the science does not define or explain in any phenomenon Universe, on the contrary, it mystifies it by involving it in false myths and beliefs without any sustainable basis, in other words, it is not science at all. We must know that there is no "official science"; Science is science because it can be verified, because it is verifiable and can be corroborated by everyone in a free and open way without the need for "special faculties" of any kind. There may be mafias or corruption within some companies that are dedicated to science, but that is totally alien to the scientific method that governs what is scientific and what differentiates it from what is not.
The "exo-scientists" speak of the "unquestionable presence of other intelligences", when none of their "investigators" have been able to demonstrate that, they only rely on affirmations of alleged UFO witnesses, "contactees" or "channelers" of extraterrestrial miticos ", without any verifiable evidence, and without evidence to prove it can not be science.
They only attack science because they do not understand it, as the old religious did before the novelties of modern cities. They like to talk with scientific technicalities, but this does not give more truth to their sayings. It is not the same a simple belief that the knowledge verified and tested. We can not talk about any of their contributions, since they have not done any, but they have spread many pseudo-scientific falsehoods in order to generate hatred or contempt for what their leaders point out, even if this is against the health and safety of the people.
An example of this is the unfounded fear of vaccines, cow's milk, gluten or transgenics, facts that have already been refuted in a sustainable way by many scientists in a free way, without obeying commercial interests, quite the opposite of what the promoters of these false ideas do.
Some of its promoters have combined such disparate topics as mixing medicine with astrology, or talking about quantum physics and mixing it with angels and extraterrestrials, or revolving medicine with "holistic" philosophies. They speak of the aura and the bad or good vibrations, and even some of them speak of alleged preternatural phenomena, but none is verifiable in a real way, which cancels its veracity, and if we add that many have been unmasked as simple frauds, that ends up burying the issue.
The fanatics of the science claim to be "the new model of modern science in which they claim that they pose science without denying God". But they are not based on the scientific method, and by not doing so they lose all character of science, and on the other hand real science does not deny God, nor does it affirm it, because it is not the object of scientific study, because, in fact, it does not exist evidence of its existence. Believing or not believing in a divine entity does not have to affect the result of a scientific investigation, or a phenomenon, because what governs the universe are the laws of nature, and these are totally impartial and neutral.
But the "exo-scientists" say that "The universe was designed prior to the Big Bang. There was a creator. Chaos does not exist as a permanent model. The human being has evolved, but there was intelligent intervention at a given moment ". But they have no evidence of this, and everything points out that the universe and the human being evolved naturally at all times, and there is no evidence of having been manipulated at any time, because an external manipulation can be detected by altering the systematic order of the biological development of an organism.
According to its advocates, "official science" dictates that "Nature has generated itself through a succession of casual processes. Everything is the result of evolution. Nothing justifies intelligent intervention. The Universe is chaos. " However, this is what the evidence that has been tested countless times up to today shows, and to deny it would be equivalent to lying. Although in the Universe not everything is a chaos, it is only a system of chemical, physical and biological processes that continue in the process of continuous development, although they are not fully understood completely.
Even if a lie is repeated a thousand times, it will remain a lie, and that science is a simple lie.
http://twitter.com/belduque
https://www.facebook.com/BelduqueOriginal/
SOURCE LINK THE BEST ONLINE UFO WEBSITES https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario