California forced vaccines: a violation of the Nuremberg Code that banned human medical experiments
California forced vaccines: a violation of the Nuremberg Code that banned human medical experiments
The concern among scientists is that the recent implementation of SB277 makes vaccines mandatory in California for men, women ...
The concern among scientists is that the recent implementation of SB277 that mandates vaccines to enforce the law in California for men, women and children is a chilling step toward mandatory universal vaccination.Coupled with the fact that governments and multinational pharmaceutical companies are being prosecuted and convicted by under-tested and managed people vaccinations, suggests that a crisis is looming.
Vaccine activists cite the notorious post-World War II Nuremberg trials in which Nazi doctors were condemned for forced human experiments. The fears are that, apparently, once benign governments are now resorting to forcing medication into the bodies of reluctant masses and their children without their consent.
A little bit of recent history ...
Here is a short video that discusses the ethical questions posed by many concerned parents during discussions prior to the implementation of SB277 in California.The focus here is the concern of these educated parents who were very aware of the possibilities of harm from the vaccine, wanting to know Who can decide if the (possible) gains outweigh the risks (known).
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91k1A5huwBg]
The vaccines are scientifically proven to have side effects ranging from mild to catastrophic. These can include anything from a mild rash, a compromised immune system, sterility, cognitive dysfunction (brain damage), paralysis, cancer, a ... Death and many more "proven" problems not mentioned here..The health care staff constantly tells us that we trust that the possibility of the vaccine being damaged is "less than one in a million", however the statistics prove again and again that this is a totally wrong and massively underestimated number, with the actual occurrences of Damage caused by vaccines being massively higher, and in fact … very common.
Even though the reported cases are far superior to the ridiculous citation mentioned above, we must also consider that the CDC itself declares that as few as 1 - 10% of the vaccine damage the incidents are reported as such, which makes the possible "superior magnitudes" superior to those we know through the CDC or the notification system of adverse events to vaccines (VAERS).
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is declaring Proposed changes restrict the vaccine reaction report, which makes these incidences of vaccine damage even more difficult to trace or count (intentionally).
Now let's consider that the vaccine court (VICP) in this country has already paid more than $ 3 BILLION in damages, and this is only a very small percentage of the potential claimants that have actually been served, and can show damages to a (known) biased system of supposed justice.
So, how rare can the vaccine damage really be ...?
Approximately thirty thousand (30,000) The VAERS reports are filed annually, and again the CDC states that only 10% (on the high side) of the actual cases are ever reported ... Yes, do the math (300,000)! Now not all of these are dangerous to life, but how many are ruining life?
If even 10-20% threatens life, is destroyed or stolen (30,000 - 60,000 a year), that is still a huge number, and the magnitudes are above "one in a million".
That would actually amount to less than 320 adverse reactions across the country if ALL people in the country (approximately 320 million people) get vaccinated in a calendar year ... But the fact is that only about 25% of the public is vaccinated every year (all vaccines combined) making the actual number of approximately 80 cases of vaccine damage ... if these doctors are correct (BULL SH # T)!
Now take the previous numbers and plan the probable damage of the vaccine with the 10% reported only in the last decade ... 300,000 x 10 = 3,000,000, and if we use the 1% we report ... 30,000,000! Now try to imagine the damage to American society, or to the entire world community vaccinated during the last century of increasing vaccine proliferation, and you will come to understand that vaccines may be responsible for more deaths and human suffering than ANY or maybe ALL wars in human history.
We can easily see, even with the most rudimentary research, that the possible incidence of vaccine damage is mental acuity and far above the lies and commonplaces sent to us by those of us who are conditioned to trust, which is almost inconceivable.
Understand that if the previous statement (less than one in a million) was true ... Vaccines would be one of the safest mechanisms on this planet, but all data point blatantly to the exact opposite.
When all is said and done, We, the People (more every day) realize the frequency and magnitude of the damage to the Vaccine and we are horrified and angry.
How is this medical experimentation?
With the many side effects tested, and a study of efficacy or long-term harm to vaccines (or multiple dose vaccines) never made or even commissioned by the CDC, which we have known for a century of use in the US, has NOT been conducted. UU to find one), they can not have any scientific or objective affirmation of being an effective or safe mechanism. Therefore, by default, HOW can this be considered or categorized as something other than medical experimentation?
Notice how Dr. Russell Blaylock connects the vaccine industry today with violations of the Nuremberg Code:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgufs-B2Llg]
The Nuremberg trials, where 23 defendants, all doctors, were accused of having been involved in the horrors of human experimentation, procedures and Nazi exposures without the consent of the experienced.The trial lasted eight months, from December 9, 1946 to August 20, 1947. Of the 23 accused, five were acquitted, seven received death sentences and the rest received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. Those condemned to death were hanged on June 2, 1948 in the Landsberg prison, Bavaria.
What resulted from this were the ten points of the Nuremberg Code. Of these ten points, the following are the most pertinent to this discussion, which are:
Nuremberg Code: Point # 1
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved must have the legal capacity to give their consent; it must be situated so that it can exercise the free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deception, coercion, scope or any other ulterior form of restriction or coercion; and you must have sufficient knowledge and understanding of the elements of the subject in question so that you can make an intelligent and clear decision.
This last element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision on the part of the experimental subject, the nature, duration and purpose of the experiment should be made known; the method and the means by which it will be carried out; all the inconveniences and reasonable dangers that can be expected; and the effects on your health or the person that may arise from your participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility to determine the quality of consent rests with each person who initiates, directs or participates in the experiment. It is a duty and personal responsibility that can not be delegated to another with impunity.
Nuremberg Code: Point # 5
No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that injury from death or incapacitation will occur; Except, perhaps, in those experiments where experimental doctors also serve as subjects.
Nuremberg Code: Point # 7
Adequate preparations must be made and appropriate facilities must be provided to protect the experimental subject even against remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
Nuremberg Code: Point # 9
During the course of the experiment, the human subject must be at liberty to put an end to the experiment if he has reached the physical or mental state in which the continuation of the experiment seems impossible.
Nuremberg Code: Point # 10
During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to finish the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of good faith, the superior skill and careful judgment required of him. continue with the investigation. It is likely that the experiment causes injury, disability or death of the experimental subject.
Sources: TheLibertyBeacon.com; NaturalNews.com
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); .
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario