Why is the Navy planning to detonate bombs near its most deadly aircraft carrier?
Why is the Navy planning to detonate bombs near its most deadly aircraft carrier?
The US Navy UU He plans to finalize the weapons integration in his new USS Ford aircraft carrier and to explode bombs in various maritime conditions near the ship to prepare for a large combat on the high seas, service officials said.
Service weapon testers will detonate a wide range of bombs, including a variety of underwater mines to evaluate the carrier's ability to withstand enemy attacks. "Shock trials," as they are called, are typically one of the final stages of the Navy process designed to bring warships from development to operational deployment.
"The USS Gerald R. Ford will conduct more tests and trails, which will culminate in crash tests throughout the ship. The ship will then work for its deployment in parallel with its initial operational tests and its evaluation, "William Couch, a Naval Sea Systems Command officer, told Warrior Maven earlier this year.
The test of how the carrier can withstand massive near explosions will follow what is called a post-elimination availability that involves a final integration of several combat systems.
"Post-Shakedown availability is planned for 12 months, with the critical route being the construction of Advanced Weapons Elevator and the updates of Advanced Arresting Gear Twister," Couch added.
The Navy's decision to undergo crash tests for its first Ford Class airline, scheduled to be deployed in 2022, appears to be especially relevant in today's modern threat environment. In a much more threatening way than most previously known threats to the Navy's aircraft carriers, potential adversaries have been designing and testing weapons designed specifically to destroy US carriers in recent years.
One such threat is the anti-aircraft missile "killer of transporters" DF-21D built in China. This weapon, which is currently being developed and actively tested by the Chinese army, can hit mobile carriers at ranges of up to 900 nautical miles.
Consequently, unlike the last 15 years of the main military operations of counterinsurgency in the USA. In the US, where operators operated largely unopposed, the possible future conflict will likely require much more advanced operator defenses, the service developers explained.
A Shock Trials analysis conducted by the Department of Defense in 2007 by the MITRE nonprofit corporation explains that many of the most likely or expected threats to warships come from "non-contact explosions where a high pressure wave is launched towards the ship. "
The MITER report, interestingly, also identifies the inspiration of Shock Trials as originated in World War II.
Recommended: What will the sixth generation fighter be like?
Recommended: Imagine a US air force UU Who never built the B-52 bomber
Recommended: The next big military sale of Russia - to Mexico?
Recommended: Would China really invade Taiwan?
"During World War II, it was discovered that although such" near-erratic "explosions do not cause serious damage to the hull or superstructure, the impact and vibrations associated with the explosion, however, incapacitate the ship, destroying components and systems critics, "said the MITER. evaluation, called "Study of test capacity and prediction of underwater discharges of naval vessels".
The MITER analysis also specifies that, after a nearby explosion, the bulkhead of a ship can oscillate, causing the ship to move up.
"Strong localized deformations are observed in the cover modes, in which different parts of the roofs move at different frequencies," MITRE writes.
The existence and timing of the USS Ford Shock Trials has been the focus of much consideration. Since post-Shock Testing and damage assessments may result in the need to make changes to the ship, some Navy developers wanted to keep the Shock Tests for the second Ford class carrier, the USS Kennedy . The reasoning, according to several reports, was to ensure that the planned timeframe for the deployment of the USS Ford was not delayed.
However, a directive from Assistant Secretary of Defense Patrick Shannahan, after the contributions of the Committee of Services of the Armed Forces of the Senate, ensured that crash judgments will be made in time for the USS Ford.
The data analysis after the crash tests has shown, over the years, that even component failures on small ships can have major consequences.
"A component shock qualification procedure that guarantees the survival of 99% of the critical components is still not good enough to guarantee the continued operational capability of a ship following a nearby submarine explosion," MITRE writes.
In addition, since the USS Ford is introducing a range of unprecedented carrier technologies, testing the impact of nearby attacks on the ship may be of greater importance than previous crash tests performed on other ships.
For example, Ford class carriers are built with a larger flight deck capable of increasing the mission generation rate by 33 percent, an electromagnetic catapult to replace the current steam system and much higher levels of automation. or computer controls throughout the ship. The spacecraft is also designed to accommodate new sensors, software, weapons and combat systems as they emerge, Navy officials said.
The USS Ford is built with four 26-megawatt generators, with a total of 104 megawatts on the ship. This helps to support the developing systems of the ship, such as its launch system for electromagnetic aircraft, or EMALS, and provides power for future systems such as lasers and rail guns, as explained by many Navy leaders.
.
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario