This photo shows a submarine of the Navy & # 039; Sinking & # 039; a British aircraft carrier. China...
This photo shows a submarine of the Navy & # 039; Sinking & # 039; a British aircraft carrier. China should worry.
The Song class ship, which displaces 2,200 tons, was close enough to hit the Kitty Hawk with a torpedo. None of the approximately twelve escort ships of the airline detected the Song until it broke the surface. The American officers were stunned.
A photo showing a US-powered nuclear submarine poking its periscope over the waves, within shooting distance of a British aircraft carrier during a war game, is a useful reminder of one of the most important truths of naval warfare .
(This appeared for the first time several years ago.)
For every sailor who is not in a submarine, the submarines are really frightening.
The stealthy and heavily armed submarines are by far the most powerful naval ships in the world for large-scale war, and possibly the best way to sink those most obvious icons of naval power, the aircraft carriers.
Recommended: The most lethal weapon in North Korea is not nuclear weapons .
Recommended: 5 worst weapons ever made .
Recommended: The most secret nuclear weapons program in the world .
It is possible that the public does not fully appreciate the combat advantage of submarines, but the main navies of the world do. Today, Chinese, Russian and American submarines, among others, are busy stalking, tracking and practicing sinking the platforms of rival fleets.
(This one appeared for the first time in 2016.)
The provocative photo, look here , shows the masts of the USS Dallas attack submarine of the US Navy. UU near the carrier HMS Illustrious during a naval exercise in the Gulf of Oman on October 3, 2013. Six warships, including Dallas and Illustrious, conducted a anti-submarine war exercise that saw Dallas stalking Illustrious, while US and British warships and surface helicopters attempted to locate and "sink" the submarine ship.
Neither of the two ships has published the results of the exercise, so it is not clear if Dallas got close enough in the course of the war game to simulate the Mark-48 torpedo shooting on the flat surface, that with 22,000 tons of displacement is one of the largest ships in Royal Navy Service.
But there is good reason to suppose that the Dallas of 7,000 tons did succeed in pretending that it was sinking as Illustrious. In 2007, HMCS Corner Brook, a diesel-electric submarine of the Canadian navy, snuck into Ilustre during an exercise in the Atlantic.
To demonstrate that they could have sunk the carrier, the crew of Corner Brook took a picture through the periscope -And the Canadian navy published it kindly. "The image represents solid evidence that the submarine was within attack parameters and would have succeeded in an attack," the commander said. Luc Cassivi, commander of the Canadian submarine division.
Corner Brook, a former British submarine that displaces only 2,400 tons, is no more capable than Dallas, and probably much less once the training of the crew is taken into account. US submariners spend much more time at sea than their Canadian counterparts.
Dallas and Corner Brook wrote down their simulated aircraft carrier deaths against allied warships in the context of a hyphenated exercise. But many other close encounters between submarines and sunbeds have taken place between rival nations in the depths of the sea, in a generally bloodless duel that, however, is extremely serious.
To prepare its submarines to hunt and sink US aircraft carriers in a future World War III, during the Cold War, the Soviet Navy ordered its hundreds of sub captains to come as close as possible to the United States' platforms ... and they will stay there. The United States Navy routinely surrounds its multi-billion dollar carriers with escorts that include surface ships and submarines, but the defensive screen is not impenetrable.
In 1974, a Soviet patrol plane Il-38 discovered what was later described as the USS Nimitz airline and its escorts on the US East Coast. UU The identity of the ship is in doubt, since in 1974 the new Nimitz was in the water at a shipyard in Virginia and is still being worked on.
Regardless of the operator, Soviet commanders ordered an attack submarine to track the platform and its escorts. "Three days we [followed] Nimitz [sic]"Sailor Pavel Borodulkin told Tom Briggs, an American who visited Russia decades later.
Borodulkin hinted that the submarine spent much of its time at a depth of 120 feet. As for being detected ... "We do not worry," Borodulkin said, explaining that the US sonar was not optimized to detect a target moving in the same direction and speed as the search ship.
"Our stealth was high," Borodulkin said. To demonstrate his pretensions, the navigator gave Briggs the blurred photo above from a flat surface, it broke through the periscope of the Soviet submarine.
That was not the only NATO aircraft carrier that the Soviets followed. In 1984, a Soviet-class Victor submarine played cat and mouse with the flat-surfaced USS Kitty Hawk on the Korean peninsula. The Americans lost the trail of the Victor and, in the dead of night, the 80,000-tonne airline collided with the 5,000-ton submarine.
"I felt the boat shudder violently and, going to the starboard side, I could see two periscopes and the top of a submarine drifting away," Kitty Hawk captain Dave Rogers told the Sydney Morning Herald. A Japanese patrol plane later saw the seemingly damaged Victor limping to three knots.
.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario