These people do not have children, for the good of the environment.
These people do not have children, for the good of the environment.
.Is our planet ready for more people? No, find the protagonists of this story and, therefore, do not want to bring the children to the world themselves.
People who do not have children in the course of their lives are not uncommon in Western countries. One in five women remains "permanently childless".
Unfortunately, the men were not asked how many children they had during the data collection. However, it is clear that there are very different reasons why someone, if there is a voluntary decision behind the lack of children, decides not to have children.
In addition, losing one's freedom and making a career a priority is difficult. An uncertain future for the children themselves still plays a decisive role for almost half of the respondents. But the motivations can go much further: some people decide against their own offspring to protect our planet.
Like Katie Rose Levin, who posted a very personal video of herself online about a year ago. She says something in him that not many people would say about themselves. Something that is still considered in our society, especially by women, as something unnatural and contradictory:
"I could have children," she explains smiling, "but my decision is to use my time and energy to do something for the community." She says. For the 32-year-old from North Carolina, one thing is crucial to this statement: our environment. "Climate change is now happening, and I do not think we should see it as something that affects our future, and yes, it affects my decision about whether or not I want to have children and how I live my life."
The Katie Rose video is one of several testimonial clips on the website of Conceivable Future, an organization based in New Hampshire, USA. UU., That tries "to create brings back to consciousness on the threat that represents the climatic change for our reproductive justice".
They do not propagate a certain attitude, they write, but simply draw attention to the fact that the climate crisis occupies a large negative space in the way our generation looks to the future.
Should we not let humanity die out?
In fact, the trend points in a different direction. We are becoming more and more people on Earth. Only 500 years ago, there were only 500 million people living on our planet, now there are some 7,500 million. According to the UN population forecasts, we could have between 7.3 and 16.6 billion people on Earth by the year 2100, depending on how many children there are per woman. This development also determines how early humanity approaches the limits of natural resources.
Do you agree with her or to oppose to their points of view?
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario