The UFO controversy / theft of souls

The UFO controversy / theft of souls https://i1.wp.com/www.eresviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/1538728030_La-controversia-ovni-robo-de-almas.jpg?fit=260%2C135&ssl=1

The UFO controversy / theft of souls



Many UFO researchers are reluctant to address the theory that "extraterrestrials are stealing our souls." It is, after all, one of the most controversial aspects of the UFO subject. However, the fact is that there are much more than a few reports of this type registered. The problem is, however, that for many in Ufology, the issue is so disturbing and disturbing that they choose to ignore it completely. One of the first and most intriguing cases recorded comes from a man named Paul Inglesby. His real name was actually Eric Inglesby and his 1978 book, UFOs and the Christian, was published under Eric Inglesby. But, two years later, he changed his name to Paul. Inglesby and since then he responded to Paul (and like Father Paul: in 1980 he became Greek Orthodox).



Just one year before the outbreak of World War II in 1939, Inglesby - who died in 2010 - came down with a very serious case of malaria. So serious was that, for a while, Inglesby took a dangerous risk in that mysterious domain between life and death. It was in this state of limbo that Inglesby had a terrifying dream. Years later, he remembered how it all happened: it was an indeterminate moment in Earth's future and UFO-like ships were rising through the skies filled with fire and smoke from our ruined radioactive planet and launching nuclear missiles into our Main cities - Killing billions and causing the destruction of the entire planet. However, UFOs were not piloted by aliens, but by demonic entities whose goal was to suck the souls of the dead in the fiery hell, which was quickly overwhelming the Earth and almost everything about it.



For Inglesby, it was literally a wake-up call. The malaria cleared, Inglesby left his unconscious state and spent the rest of his life making a career in the church and warning people to avoid the UFO problem, fearing that people would be trapped by malevolent demonic monsters. all of which Inglesby described in his 1978 book mentioned above, UFOs and the Christian.



Inglesby's history dates back to the 1930s, and it was in the 1950s that he began to talk about his nightmarish dream, after realizing that what he had seen in 1938 were images of nuclear explosions and " mushroom clouds "of the type they were. too familiar in the 1950s. However, it is important to keep in mind that the question of a connection between UFOs, extraterrestrials and the human soul did not really emerge in any significant degree until the latter part of the 1980s; which brings us to the question of Whitley Strieber. best seller of 1987, Communion.


When the news came out of Strieber's planned book, most ufologists assumed that the book, in terms of its content and its theories, would be quite similar to John Fuller's. The trip interrupted of 1966 and to the book of Budd Hopkins in 1981, Lost time. Both books adhered to the now familiar theory that extraterrestrials are stealing our DNA to save their decaying species. Strieber's revelations were, in many ways, far removed from the writings of Hopkins and Fuller, which is why the book created a firestorm in those places where ufologists meet. However, as I saw it, Strieber's book was a breath of fresh air that invited reflection.



In Communion, Strieber made it very clear that his own encounters with "the Visitors", and those of others with whom he had spoken, revealed a surprising connection between the extraterrestrial abductions and the human soul; even a paradigm shift connection. In his book, Strieber spoke about how the abductees experienced that their souls "crawled" from their bodies during the kidnappings. His kidnappers told Strieber himself that they "recycled" human souls. That sounds quite comforting, since it suggests that reincarnation can be a reality, something that will ensure more lives after this. But did Strieber tell the whole truth of his captors? Or, was this an attempt on your part to push things down a different and more attractive path? Certainly, Strieber admitted something remarkable that suggests that he acknowledged that not everything was good and positive.


Strieber said that the more and more he got into the subject of his encounters, and while trying to understand what was happening, he was unable to erase from his mind the theories of Charles Fort. For those who do not know, Fort was a writer acclaimed in all kinds of paranormal phenomena. His books include The Y Wild talents. Fort had somberly suggested that, according to Strieber's own words in his 1988 book, TransformationWe, the human race, are "animals here for slaughter and incapable of seeing the greatest and most terrible meanings that surround us".



As for more about the opinions of Charles Fort, they can be read in his classic 1919 title, The book of the condemned. Fort wrote:I think we are property [italics mine]. I must say that we belong to something: that once, this land was no man's land, that other worlds explored and colonized here, and fought each other for possession, but that now it is owned by something: that something is property of this land - Everyone else was warned.


.

.

SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Grupos de privacidad que reclaman anuncios en línea pueden dirigirse a víctimas de abuso

¿Puede Apple Watch prevenir los golpes? Nuevo estudio pretende descubrir

Las empresas ofrecen regalos gratuitos, ofertas especiales de cierre y asistencia a los trabajadores...