Out & # 039; Missiled & # 039;: How would the United States stop Russia or China's massive...
Out & # 039; Missiled & # 039;: How would the United States stop Russia or China's massive missile reserve?
US missile defense has focused so much on preventing ballistic missiles from hitting the US homeland, which has neglected another compelling threat.
Mass salvoes of cruise missiles and armed drones could devastate US overseas bases. UU., Those vital bastions, like Guam, that provide airfields, ports and supply bases. While the United States has been concerned about the possibility of a few ballistic missiles from North Korea hitting the west coast, China and Russia have accumulated huge reserves of guided weapons that endanger US bases.
"During most of the post-Cold War era, the DoD (Defense Department) focused its missile defense priorities on the placement of kinetic weapons on land and at sea to intercept ballistic threats," says one new study by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Evaluation in Washington, DC. "With the exception of the Navy, no other Service has presented significant new capabilities to counter cruise missile salvoes."
Entitled "Aerial and missile defense at a crossroads: new concepts and technologies to defend the overseas bases of the United States", the study describes the wide range of threats to US facilities. China has more than 1,500 ballistic missiles, including some intermediate-range DF-26 rockets that can reach 2,000 miles deep in the Western Pacific, within range of the US bases in Guam. It also has thousands of cruise missiles launched from the air, including the CJ-20 with a range of one thousand miles. The ground-based Iskander ballistic missile, as well as the hypersonic weapon Khinzal (Mach 5 or more) launched from the air, are short-range missiles that could be the US bases in Europe. Both China and Russia are developing armed drones that can hit distant targets.
While the US Missile Defense Agency UU It has the task of stopping strategic ballistic missiles, "it is unlikely that MDA has the experience and funding to develop a much more robust systems system with the necessary capacity to defend critical infrastructure in the United States." and in the US military installations. UU abroad against major salvo attacks in the short term, "says CSBA.
That leaves the United States Army, which is responsible for providing ground defenses against theater ballistic missiles and cruise missiles. The Army has 50 air defense and Patriot missile batteries with 480 launchers and more than 1,200 interceptor missiles. However, "they are expensive and their combined capacity would be insufficient to protect the air bases and other military infrastructures on which the United States and allied forces would depend during a major conflict with great power," CSBA says.
The Army has only seven batteries, with 42 launchers and 500 interceptors, of the Aerial Defense Systems for Altitude Altitude Terminal (THAAD). The Army wants two more batteries, but the price of $ 7.5 billion may be too high. The problem is complicated by the lack of an integrated battle management system for the defense of the base, to coordinate several sensors and defensive weapons.
Recommended: What will the sixth generation fighter be like?
Recommended: Imagine a US air force UU Who never built the B-52 bomber
Recommended: The next big military sale of Russia - to Mexico?
Recommended: Would China really invade Taiwan?
CSBA advocates a defense system except to protect bases abroad. One possibility is a double ring of external and internal defense. The outer ring would consist of satellites and drones equipped with sensors. An integrated battle command system would connect sensors to manned aircraft and UAVs armed with interceptors to shoot down ballistic missiles during the momentum phase, when they are most vulnerable, as well as to shoot down enemy aircraft before they can launch cruise missiles. .
The inner layer would be similar, with the addition of drones and terrestrial batteries armed with high-energy lasers, high-powered ground-based microwave weapons whose beams would fry the missile electronics and even the Army's howitzers firing high-speed projectiles ( HVP). "The future artillery could launch HVP at speeds needed to defeat very fast moving targets, such as supersonic cruise missiles and high-performance heavy vehicles. [hypersonic glide vehicles]. "
This would require the development of the necessary drones, lasers, interceptor missiles and microwave weapons. But CSBA argues that grassroots defense should be a priority. "The first step to achieve this goal is to frame the challenge as a competition of savagery between adversaries who have mature capabilities to attack with hundreds and possibly thousands of guided weapons instead of a small number of ballistic missiles," says the CSBA. "Investing in effective non-kinetic and kinetic systems against the growing threat of cruise missiles and UAV attacks would create stronger defenses for the theatrical bases on which DoD continues to rely for its operations."
Michael Peck is a contributing writer for the National Interest. It can be found at Twitter Y Facebook.
.
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario