Nord Stream 2: to be or not to be?
Nord Stream 2: to be or not to be?
However, the frank euphoria is absolutely strange. In fact, not all countries will benefit from the project, but as a result we will pay all together.
At first glance, it may seem that Germany's energy dependence on Russia, which with the implementation of Nord Stream 2 will increase from the current 55% to 80%, will create both economic and political problems only for Germans. At the same time, it must not forget that Germany, despite the undoubtedly strong economic positions, is a member of the European Union. According to European legislation, their problems should they arise (and will arise, of course) will fall on the shoulders of the entire European community. And only a few experts have already paid attention that the price of the Nord Stream 2 project may actually be too high. That's exactly what Thierry Bros, who is a principal investigator at the Institute for Energy Studies in Oxford, where he is in charge of Quarterly Gas Review, a visiting professor at SciencesPo Paris and a leading expert on Energy Delta Institute, says. According to him, "there is the issue of European legislation. We have legislation on security of supply that obliges us to act collectively. If a country depends exclusively on a supplier, does it comply with regulation N-1 (provision for action in the event of an interruption of a major source of gas)?
What if there is a problem? They do not have to be the Russians; It can be a technical problem ...
According to the legislation, in case there is a problem in Germany, we will have to disconnect the French, the Poles, the Hungarians and the Italians to provide gas to the Germans. Germany is not following all those EU rules. The problem is that, contrary to what Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin declared at their meeting in August, Nord Stream 2 is a political project, not just a commercial one. Finally, after many, many months, Angela Merkel had to admit that Nord Stream 2 is not only a commercial project, but also a political one. And if it is political, it should be discussed with the other EU Member States.
Brussels has tried to stop the Nord Stream 2 in different ways, because it wants a bit of Ukrainian transit. A decision of the WTO is generally in favor of the decisions of Brussels. The Commission now knows that it can press for more disaggregation. The power of Brussels is a little stronger. Germany does not show any sign of willingness to enter into a fair and decent negotiation.
Merkel was one of the leading figures at European level when France had a weak government. That ended. France returns to the track, Greece, Portugal and Spain return to the track. There is a unit. "
It is also necessary to remember that previously, in Vilnius, the heads of the parliaments of Poland, Lithuania and Latvia signed the letter with the danger warning of the pipeline Nord Stream 2 addressed to the heads of the parliaments of European countries. Later, Nord Stream 2 also opposed Estonia.
It is absolutely clear that Nord Stream 2 not only violates the provisions of European energy legislation, which reduces the monopoly power of electricity and gas suppliers, but represents an obvious threat to all EU Member States. However, despite all the "no benefits" and the disagreement of many states, the gas pipeline construction project is still being implemented. Let's ask about the benefits of European politicians who support the Nord Stream 2 project law.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario