Internet censorship has just taken an unprecedented leap, and almost nobody realized

Internet censorship has just taken an unprecedented leap, and almost nobody realized https://i2.wp.com/www.eresviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/La-censura-en-Internet-acaba-de-dar-un-salto-sin-precedentes-y-casi-nadie-se-dio-cuenta.jpg?fit=260%2C127&ssl=1

Internet censorship has just taken an unprecedented leap, and almost nobody realized





While most of the independent media focused on debating the way people talk about Kanye West and the disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashogg ...


While most of the independent media focused on debating the way people talk about Kanye West and the disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, there was an unprecedented escalation in Internet censorship.
by Caitlin Johnstone
While most of the independent media focused on debating the way people talk about Kanye West and the disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, there was an unprecedented escalation in Internet censorship that threatens everything that we all care He received frightfully scant attention.
After massive purge From hundreds of pages with political orientation and personal accounts of "non-authentic behavior", Facebook rightly received a good deal of criticism for the hazy and highly contested base of that action.





What received relatively little attention was the much more sinister step that followed: a few hours after being deleted from Facebook, several alternative anti-establishment media sites had their accounts completely. removed from Twitter too.
At the time of writing this article, I am aware of three major alternative media that were expelled from both platforms at almost the same time: Anti-Media, the Free Thought Project and Police Police, all of which had millions of followers on Facebook.. Both of them Chief editor of Anti-Media and its Creative director They were also banned by Twitter, and they are also prevented from having new accounts on that site.
"Unfortunately, I always felt that the day would come when alternative media would be removed from the main social media sites," said Anti-Media's Chief Creative Director, S.M. Gibson told me in a statement. 
"That's why I prepared myself to have backup accounts years ago. The fact that those accounts, as well as the 3 accounts of people associated with Anti-Media were banned without prior notice and without any reason offered by any of the platforms makes me believe that this purge was indeed orchestrated by someone. I do not know who he is, but this attack on the information was much more concise and methodical to silence the truth than most realize or is being reported. "











UPDATE on the massive purge of 800 dissenting voices that occur in the US UU 
Forbidden from Facebook yesterday:
-Antimedia
-Free thinking project
-PoliceThePolice
-Minds social networks
Suspended from Twitter:
-Antimedia + editors
-FreeThoughtProject + editors
-PoliceThePolice + editors







- Lee Camp [Redacted] (@LeeCamp) October 12, 2018














Now it is clear that there is (A) some degree of communication / coordination between Twitter and Facebook about their respective censorship practices, or (B) the information that is provided to Twitter and Facebook by another party with respect to the objectives of censorship . 
Either way, it means that now there is some established mechanism that links the censorship of dissenting voices on multiple platforms. We are starting to see smaller anti-establishment alternative media isolated from their audiences by the same kind of Multi-platform Silence coordinated that we saw for the first time with Alex Jones in August.
This is such a serious threat to our ability to network and share information with each other as anything you can imagine. 
If the new media are beginning to silence dissenting voices in unison, that means that we can see the complete alternative media, not only partially silenced but completely silenced, their ability to grow their audience and get information in very populated with the Internet completely paralyzed. .
This is huge, this is dangerous, and this is not reported. When I was removed from Twitter in August for "abusing" John McCain, there was a big and indignant uproar on Twitter, and my account was quickly restored with an apology. 
And I'm really grateful for that, but the phenomenon of multiple high-profile alternative media suddenly silenced in unison by the two larger social media platforms should generate more outrage than an Australian blogger who loses his Twitter account, not less. This should be the main story in alternative media, because it affects us all.
Every time I try to talk about how Internet censorship threatens our ability to get rid of the oligarchy, you will always find a guy in your face who has read a book by Ayn Rand and thinks he knows everything, saying things like "Facebook is a Private company! You can do what you want! 
Is now? 
It has not been facebook inviting groups funded by the government of the United States to help regulate your operations, swearing about him Senate floor to do more To facilitate the interests of the government of the United States, eliminating accounts. in the direction of the governments of the United States and IsraelY delivering the guide of his behavior of censure to the Atlantic Council, who receives funds From the government of the United States, the EU, NATO and the Gulf states? 

















- Daniel McAdams (@DanielLMcAdams) October 12, 2018






How "private" is that? 
Facebook is a corporation deeply rooted by the government.Y Facebook censorship is just what government censorship looks like In a corporatist system of government.
Speaking of the Atlantic Council, he recently published a very interesting 21 page document about a US military conference UU which details, in present time, how the technological giants of Silicon Valley are being used to nullify the threat that the new media landscape represents for the establishment of US power. UU
From this document, the world socialist web. write the following:
"Enter social network companies. The best mechanism to suppress opposing views and promote narratives in favor of the government is the private sector, particularly "technological giants, such as Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter," which can "determine what people see and do not go".
"Watts adds:" Fortunately, changes in the policies of social media platforms such as Facebook have had a significant impact on the type and quality of the content being transmitted. "
"The private sector, therefore, must do the dirty work of the government, because government propaganda is viewed with suspicion by the population. 
"Companies and the private sector may not naturally understand the role they play in the fight against misinformation, but theirs is one of the most important ..." At least in the West, they have been assigned a central role due to the greater confidence of the general public as institutions. "

















- #FreeAssange! (tweets per campaign) ⌛ (@JulianAssange) October 5, 2018














The best way to deal with a manipulative sociopath is to point and make a lot of noise every time they do something strange and creepy. The more you let them abuse you in private, the more they can catch you and keep you going with their sickness plans.
If you notice them doing something weird, the best way to nullify all the tools in your small, evil toolbox is to point and shout "Hey! What are you doing? Why are you doing that? That's weird! "Make people look, because those beasts can not advance their manipulations with a lot of critical eyes on them.
Propaganda and censorship work in the same way. If you are not familiar with the concept of the streisand effect, I encourage you to start acquainting yourself with it. 
Called thus for an incident in which Barbra Streisand attempted to delete the online photographs of her Malibu residence and, therefore, inadvertently called her attention, the Streisand effect describes the way in which attempts to hide and censor information can be used to attract more attention If the cover-up attracts the interest of the public.. 
Each censor must prevent this from happening to do their work effectively; If it seems that getting something out of public view would attract more attention, then they can not practice censorship in that case.
So we're going to Streisand this thing up, huh?
Let's make a big noise of anger about this new multiplatform escalation in Internet censorship, and make a big noise of anger every time someone makes a move to silence dissident political discourse in the new media environment..
The manipulators can only work in the dark, so never give them. 
Whatever you try, we have to make a lot of noise about it.
That, by itself, would be throwing a huge obstacle in its path as we find new ways to open a path for more and more networks and information exchange. These bastards have controlled the narrative for too long.
Important! The best way to avoid censorship on the internet is subscribe by email.



http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)

  {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?

  n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};

  if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';

  n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;

  t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];

  s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',

  'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');

  fbq('init', '369524843414444');

  fbq('track', 'PageView');

(function(d, s, id) {

  var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];

  if (d.getElementById(id)) return;

  js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;

  js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";

  fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);

}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));    .


SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM 
https://www.beviral.online