EPA fights against & # 039; secret science & # 039; slowed down in the middle of a rejection of the...
EPA fights against & # 039; secret science & # 039; slowed down in the middle of a rejection of the researchers
A furious public response has slowed the Trump administration's plan to stop using the so-called "secret science," a measure that, according to scientists, may have restricted the types of research used to regulate toxins, pesticides and pollution .
Six months ago, the then head of the EPA Scott Pruitt He said that his agency would demand that the raw data behind each study be made public before being used to regulate the ambient.
"Americans deserve to evaluate the legitimacy of the science that underlies EPA's decisions that can affect their lives," he said at the time.
The scientific community was outraged. They pointed out that such a rule might not be considered by studies that use medical records of patients that may be critical in establishing links between the environment and the public. Health, like air pollution. These records must be kept confidential under the law.
Pruitt later resigned under a cloud of ethical investigations, including accusations that he reached a real estate agreement with a lobbyist. He was replaced by his deputy, Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist.
On Wednesday, EPA listed the rule as long-term, which means it does not expect to "publish an action within the next 12 months," according to EPA spokesman Michael Abboud.
Later, he said the agency is working as quickly as possible on the rule and could move forward sooner, but said he has to answer more than half a million comments and complete the rest of the official process before the rule is final.
The EPA was flooded with 597,000 written comments in just three months and at a hearing on July 17, nearly 100 speakers on the subject, including members of Congress, participated. Officials said they did not want to speed up the review process and do not have a set deadline for the rule.
"This is not a delay," Abboud said. "The agency continues its internal regulatory development process for this action, the spring agenda did not give a deadline for a final rule."
Gina McCarthy, who led the EPA under President Barack Obama, said the proposed rule could undermine rules designed to protect public health because the studies used to support those rules are based on private health data.
"Do not be fooled by this talk of transparency. [Pruitt] and some conservative members of Congress are establishing a non-existent problem to prevent the E.P.A. "Using the best available science," McCarthy wrote in a New York Times article with the former head of the EPA air office.
.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',
'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq('init', '369524843414444');
fbq('track', 'PageView');
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario