& # 039; You can not be civil & # 039;
& # 039; You can not be civil & # 039;
At a time when everything is said to be possible in American politics, the impossible has just happened. Hillary Clinton has aligned herself with Donald Trump's vision of the Democratic Party.
Mr. Trump has been using his political rallies to denounce "the radical democrats" as "an angry mafia." On Tuesday, Mrs. Clinton told CNN: "You can not be a civilian with a political party that wants to destroy what you represent, what matters to you." You can not be a civilian, look at the Trump sun and the Clinton moon in a moment of political eclipse.
It is difficult to choose exactly when, in the last month, the Democrats changed the national focus towards Mr. Trump and his own behavior. I would say it was the last Senate vote on Saturday at the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh.
The Democrats had thrown everything at Judge Kavanaugh, and it was over. But not in the Senate gallery. At the moment, literally, the spectators began to shout at the senators on the floor. The guards moved towards the chamber doors, and the voting stopped while the screamers were removed.
During the presidency of Ronald Reagan, the ambassador of the United States to the United Nations was Jeane Kirkpatrick, who in some way was a template for the stay of Nikki Haley in the United States as a non-apologetic defender of the interests of the United States. At the 1984 Republican National Convention, Kirkpatrick delivered a memorable speech for one phrase: "the San Francisco Democrats." The idea behind "the democrats of San Francisco" has never died. It represents a party on the left that can not be selected. That year, Reagan defeated Walter Mondale by 525 to 13 electoral votes.
Democrats will complain that Donald Trump is out of place if they are considered divisive or radical after he has passed his presidency by polarizing the electorate with his rhetoric and
account. Maybe, but that was then. Whatever was at stake in the midterm elections, it was surpassed by the nomination of Kavanaugh, who transfigured the nation for weeks.
The Democrats were in good shape during the first phase of Kavanaugh's hearings, sometimes intense in their judicial beliefs. But it was phase two, the week of Christine Blasey Ford, created by Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Democratic Party activists, that defined the battle lines for the November elections.
Audiences began as a family narrative: Republicans are hostile to women. But that got out of control towards broader issues of fundamental equity and due process.
In recent conversations with the Democrats, once Kavanaugh's arguments have been overcome, most express a desire for more political civility. This is an illusion. The party has a problem: the San Francisco Democrats are back.
There are types of policies on the left that prefer to challenge campaigns for health care and income disparities. But the Kavanaugh episode shows that the party is being taken over what I would call the Left Rose Code.
The professional network of the Code Rosa Izquierda, typified by the woman financed by George-Soros who caught Senator Jeff Flake in an elevator, has virtually no interest in important political objectives.
The Left Rose Code specializes in the creation of political history lines or "frames", such as conservatives are weak in sexual abuse, which promotes with theatrical protests, distributes on social networks and depends on the mainstream media to the constant repetition. This is something familiar. It's called agitprop.
The goal is to make the wider electorate nervous and doubtful. It worked. Many voters are now nervous about the street fighters of the Democrats. All Republicans, from Donald Trump to dog hunters, face the "furious crowd" of Senate shouting Democrats and restaurant marauders.
What about the role of superior law in the new incivility? Good question. The answer is, they are gone. The most visible face of conservatism through Kavanaugh's struggle was. . . Senator Chuck Grassley
A valid criticism of Donald Trump is that he has not expanded his base into a broader coalition. But his luck in attracting self-destructive opponents is amazing.
The Democrats are contracting any coalition that Barack Obama has left them in a limited activist resistance, whose "anger" is mainly an act practiced.
The Democrats are taking too much with their own tactics. They have turned Twitter into basically a night of open microphone 24/7. Look how cool and smart we are. Kamala Harris and Cory Booker are mostly milking this niche audience. It's all so rotated and theatrical.
Here is Eric Holder in a campaign. event in Georgia: "Michelle [Obama] always says: "When they come down, we go up". No. No. When they come down, we kick them. "
Maybe it's historical determinism. The left of the constant protest captured the Democratic Party in the late 1960s and scared the country with the overwhelming victory of Richard Nixon against George McGovern in 1972. Four and a half decades later, another generation of Democratic politicians is responding to the same old radical mermaid. song, "You can not be civil."
For a while, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, governors of the southern United States, taught them that they will not win. One thing never changes with the American left: it always goes too far.
Write henninger@wsj.com.
.
.
SOURCE LINK ERESVIRAL.COM https://www.beviral.online
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario